I gave a couple of women very nice Christmas presents over the recent holiday season. And Iβm not talking about the lingerie I got my wife or the coffee maker I got my daughter. Iβm talking about the gift of extra Social Security benefits I got for two of my readers.
I donβt want to imply that I have some kind of βinβ with my former colleagues at the Social Security Administration and that all I have to do is make a few phone calls and magically increase someoneβs Social Security check. Sorry, I canβt do that. But I can explain Social Security rules to people, and sometimes my explanation leads to higher monthly benefits.
I will give some background for the cases involved, and maybe in doing so I will help other women get unexpected Social Security benefits.
Iβll call the first woman βLisa.β She wrote to me late last year. She said she was thinking of filing for her Social Security at age 62. She didnβt like the idea of taking reduced retirement benefits, but she said she needed the money so she just made up her mind to live with the reduction. She wrote to ask me some general questions about applying for Social Security benefits.
She also told me that she was married many years ago, but that her husband died when they were both still in their 20s. That was way back in the 1980s. She had two subsequent marriages, but neither panned out and each ended in divorce after only a few years.
I told Lisa that before she proceeded with her claim for reduced retirement benefits, she should check into possible widowβs benefits on her first husbandβs account. Lisa was a bit skeptical. After all, he died more than 30 years ago. And he died at such a young age that he had paid into the Social Security system for less than 10 years. Certainly, she thought, his Social Security benefit couldnβt be worth much money.
But I told Lisa about two vagaries to the Social Security benefit computation formula for survivor benefits that would work in her favor. First, past earnings are indexed for inflation. So those 1980s dollars her deceased husband made would be turned into present-value dollars for the purposes of figuring her widowβs benefit. And second, when they figure her husbandβs basic Social Security rate (upon which her widowβs benefit is derived), they essentially treat it as if he was due his full retirement age benefit at the time of death. So I told Lisa she might be pleasantly surprised how much her widowβs benefit would turn out to be.
And I explained to Lisa that widows (and widowers) have one advantage other Social Security beneficiaries usually donβt have. And that is that they can file for reduced benefits on one record and later switch to full benefits on another record.
So I told Lisa to contact her local Social Security office and check into possible widowβs benefits and then compare them with her own retirement benefits and then play around with that βwidowβs advantageβ I just mentioned in the prior paragraph.
Long story short: Just before Christmas, I got a follow-up email from Lisa. She was ecstatic. She had been to her local Social Security office and found out she was due a more-than-adequate amount in monthly widowβs benefits off her deceased husbandβs Social Security record β the guy who had died so many years ago. So Lisa filed for reduced widowβs benefits on his account.
She will be getting 82.5 percent of his basic Social Security rate. She will collect those benefits until age 66, when she will switch to 100 percent of her own retirement benefit rate.
Or if she thinks she can live off those reduced widowβs benefits for another four years, she could wait until age 70 and then file for her retirement benefits, at which point she would get a 32 percent delayed retirement bonus added to her monthly retirement checks.
Lisa told me how thrilled she was to be getting those unexpected widowβs benefits. She thanked me profusely.
But truth be told, I may not have been as big a Santa Claus to Lisa as she thinks. My hunch is that had she gone to her Social Security office to file for her retirement benefits, the Social Security agent would have steered her to the widowβs claim anyway.
Part of the Social Security retirement claim asks about prior marriages. Those (and other questions) are designed to be possible leads for other potential Social Security benefits. A good Social Security clerk would have noticed that prior marriage and probably checked into widowβs benefits for Lisa even if I had never brought up the subject.
I also heard from another reader who learned of unexpected benefits from a long-ago departed husband based on a recent column I wrote. I will call her βBetty.β Betty, who is in her 80s, had been getting her own retirement benefits for years. She was married only once for 15 years. But that marriage ended 40 years ago. So she had essentially forgotten about the guy.
But in a recent column, I discussed divorced widowβs benefits. And that caused a little light to go on in Bettyβs head. She did a little digging and learned her ex died almost 10 years ago. As far as she could tell, she met all the eligibility requirements for divorced widowβs benefits: She was (way) over 60; she had been married for more than 10 years; she was not currently married; and she figured her own Social Security benefit was less than her ex-husbandβs rate.
So she contacted her local Social Security office and sure enough: She was due an extra $500 per month in divorced widowβs benefits. On the one hand, she kicked herself for not having filed for these benefits 10 years ago when her ex died. On the other hand, she was able to claim six monthsβ worth of retroactive widowβs payments β the maximum allowed by law.
Some readers may be wondering why those βleading questionsβ I mentioned in Lisaβs case didnβt work for Betty. Well, you must remember that when Betty applied for her retirement benefits, her ex was still alive. She wasnβt due anything extra at the time because a divorced wifeβs rate is way less than a divorced widowβs rate.
So let this be a lesson to other readers out there. If you had a prior marriage, even one that ended many years ago, you may be due some extra monthly benefits from that spouseβs Social Security record.