PHOENIX β€” Got an opinion on the plan to tap the state land-trust account to boost funding for schools?

Want to tell more than just your friends?

Well, for $75 you can spread the word.

That’s all it takes to put a 300-word argument into a pamphlet to be mailed to all 3.3 million registered Arizona voters ahead of the May 17 election. You can even make your point with boldface and italics.

But you’ve got to act fast: The deadline is 5 p.m. Friday.

It’s all part of long-standing state law that allows individuals, organizations and political committees to make their own pitch to voters. The Secretary of State’s Office then mails these out, one to each household with at least one registered voter.

Matt Roberts, spokesman for the agency, said his office prefers that arguments be submitted to elections.azsos.gov through email.

Ideally, he said, the text should be put into the body of the message. That ensures there are no compatibility problems reading it and that the arguments are formatted as requested.

But an email is just the first step. Roberts said his office needs a hard copy of the argument as well as payment, both of which must be postmarked by that 5 p.m. Friday deadline.

Cash is acceptable as are credit cards, though those payments have to be made in person.

Roberts said what people want to say about Proposition 123 is totally up to them. And no one will judge if it’s relevant.

β€œWe won’t be editing anything for content,” he said. β€œSo, in theory, if someone just wanted to list off their Christmas list, they could potentially do so.”

Nor will state employees correct grammar or spelling errors.

The hard-copy submissions must be signed, and all arguments must include the name, address and phone number of those signing, though only the name and city will appear in the pamphlet.

For political committees, the only acceptable signers are chairman or treasurer. And ballot arguments submitted by other organizations or corporations must contain the signatures of at least two executive officers.

The ballot measure would provide $3 billion to schools over the next decade, much of it from trust-land proceeds, to settle a lawsuit charging that lawmakers illegally ignored a 2000 ballot measure requiring state aid be increased every year to account for inflation.


Become a #ThisIsTucson member! Your contribution helps our team bring you stories that keep you connected to the community. Become a member today.