UPDATE: Arizona GOP leader asks state lawmaker to resign over immigration comments
PHOENIX — A first-term Prescott lawmaker is warning that immigration “represents an existential threat to the United States” and needs to be curtailed before the country is irrevocably altered.
Republican state Rep. David Stringer said that new immigrants — especially those from non-European countries — do not assimilate as easily as those who came a century earlier.
And Stringer said the rapid influx of Hispanic children has made school integration impossible because “there aren’t enough white kids to go around,” not only because of the pure numbers of immigrants but because Anglo parents choose to either move to new areas or simply put their children in private or charter schools.
Stringer’s comments Wednesday to Capitol Media Services came after nearly a minute of his 17-minute speech he made Monday to the Republican Men’s Forum in Prescott were posted on Facebook. He said the comments on immigration, at the end of his discussion of criminal-justice reform, were “taken out of context and distorted by omission.”
But Stringer, first elected to the Legislature in 2016, acknowledged his remarks were prepared and that his words were meant to be a warning of sorts to his audience which was largely, if not exclusively Anglo, that the country they know is changing.
“I’m telling them, ‘You need to be prepared for this,’” he said.
And Stringer told Capitol Media Services he does believe that unless immigration is slowed — and significantly — there will be problems for the United States.
“Before we bring in a lot of new immigrants, we need to figure out how we assimilate the folks that are here,” he said. “And maybe we have reached the point where we need a little breathing room now, we need a little time to assimilate.”
He said there are “political implications of massive demographic change and displacement.”
“Remember now: In the United States, people are moving all over the place,” Stringer said.
“It’s almost like ‘white flight’ that it constitutes an existential threat to the United States,” he explained. “I think we could be facing national dissolution in a decade or two if we don’t get control of the immigration issue.”
It starts, he said, with integration. Stringer said that requirement, which has its roots in the historic 1954 U.S. Supreme Court decision of Brown v. Board of Education.
“The whole concept of integration is giving minority kids who are typically in worse neighborhoods, not as good a school, the same kind of advantages that white kids have,” Stringer said. “So you integrate them with the white schools and you get a better, more fair result.”
But Stringer said that is becoming increasingly difficult in a state where he said the “minority” population makes up 60 percent of public schools.
“There’s not enough white kids to integrate all these schools because we’ve had so much immigration over a short period of time,” he said, leading to “a dramatic demographic transformation.”
But the issue, Stringer said, is deeper than just education.
“You can’t simply have amnesty after amnesty and not control your borders and continue to remain a viable, unified country,” he said. “That’s what I think.”
Stringer said while “American has been a melting pot,” what’s happening now is different.
“It’s been a melting pot for people of European descent,” he said.
“So if you’re a Swede, a Norwegian, an Irishman and a Frenchman, after the second or third generation, your kids are all alike,” Stringer explained.
“They don’t have any accents. They’re indistinguishable.”
That’s not true of Hispanics, he said
“Talk to Asians,” he said. “Even though they’re affluent, they’re an educated, cultured group, they still have a sense of maybe not fully participating in American life.”
And Stringer said even African-Americans who have been here for hundreds of years “still have not been fully assimilated into American culture.”
And there’s something else about immigrants from Mexico and points south.
“They go back and forth,” Stringer said. “They have their connections with their family, their connections with their culture, their language, their connections with their country are stronger than when you came over from Russia or you came over from the Ukraine or you came over from Italy or wherever, you were crossing a sea and you didn’t have these lines of connections.”
