Joey Lee Healer and Gregory Valencia

Joey Healer, left, and Gregory Valencia are serving life terms for unrelated Tucson homicides in the 1990s.

PHOENIX — Two men serving life terms for Tucson killings committed as juveniles will get a chance to convince a judge they should eventually be let out of prison, the Arizona Supreme Court ruled Friday.

The justices did not say that Gregory Valencia Jr. and Joey Healer should ever be allowed out of prison. Both were previously sentenced by Pima County judges to terms of natural life, meaning no possibility of parole.

But Chief Justice Scott Bales, writing for the unanimous court, said he and his colleagues are bound by a ruling from the U.S. Supreme Court that such sentences for juveniles should be reserved only for the worst of the worst. The nation’s high court also said that decision has to be applied retroactively.

Bales said that means Valencia and Healer are entitled to have a judge reconsider the sentence and, if appropriate, reduce it to where they would have a chance to get out some day.

In those rulings, the U.S. Supreme Court concluded that “appropriate occasions for sentencing juveniles to the harshest possible penalty will be uncommon.”

Such sentences can be imposed only on the “rare juvenile offender whose crime reflects irreparable corruption” versus “transient immaturity.”

That language bothers Arizona Supreme Court Justice Clint Bolick.

“ ‘Transient immaturity’ is when my adolescent daughter slugs her big brother,” he wrote for himself and Justice John Pelander, criticizing the logic of the U.S. rulings. “It may even describe peer pressures that influence reckless behavior,” Bolick continued. “But it is not an apt rationalization for cold-blooded murder.”

Bolick said the facts in these two Pima County cases from the 1990s suggest the sentences were appropriate. “The murders in these cases were brutal,” he said.

Bolick said Healer borrowed a sawed-off rifle and entered the home of Chester Iserman, an elderly man who had given Healer odd jobs so he could earn money. Healer, 16 at the time, shot Iserman through the eye, killing him, and then stole his truck.

Valencia, 17 in 1995, entered a condominium complex with a younger accomplice, took a bicycle from an enclosed patio and then tried to get into the patio of another unit. When homeowner Fred George came out to investigate, the other teen threw the stolen bicycle at George and Valencia shot him in the head.

Bolick said the sentencing judges in both cases determined the defendants should never be released, even after considering all evidence including their youth.

Bales stressed that Friday’s rulings don’t mean either Healer or Valencia will ever get out of prison. All they do is give them a day in court.

“At these hearings, they will have an opportunity to establish, by a preponderance of the evidence, that their crimes did not reflect irreparable corruption but instead transient immaturity,” he wrote. “Only if they meet this burden will they establish that their natural life sentences are unconstitutional, thus entitling them to resentencing.”


Become a #ThisIsTucson member! Your contribution helps our team bring you stories that keep you connected to the community. Become a member today.