PHOENIX β Get ready to look at campaign signs longer each election.
And new fights between candidates.
The state Senate on Monday gave preliminary approval to allowing candidates to put up their signs starting 86 days before the election. Thatβs nearly twice as long as now permitted.
With the primary now in late August, that means a signs could start appearing in May.
And HB 2017 also ensures that candidates who win the primary can now keep those signs in place through the November election.
But the lawmakers who depend on those signs also voted to make it a crime to βobscureβ someone elseβs signs, complete with a $750 fine and four months in county jail. It even allows those offending signs to be removed.
Only thing is, no one, including the author of the legislation, could say precisely when a sign violates the law and makes the person who put it up subject to criminal penalties.
There even is a disagreement about who can legally remove a sign that may be blocking another.
Rep. David Stevens, R-Sierra Vista, said that 86-day window ahead of the primary election ensures that candidates can get the message out to those who vote early. He said ballots are mailed out 60 days ahead of each election.
But the more interesting issue is the language about obscuring someone elseβs ballot. Even Stevens conceded the proposed law is far from clear.
βBy what angle?β he asked.
βIf youβre at a corner and youβre driving, it changes as you drive whether thereβs obstruction or not,β Stevens said.
The goal, he said, is to stop one candidate from putting up a sign directly in front of that of a foe, effectively making that other personβs sign useless. But Stevens said the measure now awaiting a final Senate vote is far from clear.
βWhat if Iβve got a 4-by-4 (foot) sign and someoneβs got an 8-inch-by-12-inch sign in front of mine,β he said. βIs that an obstruction if you canβt see a little corner?β
The senators debating the House-passed measure Monday had no better luck figuring out what would be a crime.
βWe donβt know how you define βobscure,ββ said Sen. Steve Farley, D-Tucson.
βDoes that mean you cover up a quarter inch of the corner?β he asked. βOr do you cover up the entire thing?β
Sen. Jeff Dial, R-Chandler, conceded he didnβt really have an answer. He suggested it might have to be handled on a case-by-case basis βwhere youβd have to be taking pictures, documenting it.β
But Dial said he isnβt terribly concerned that the police will be busy investigating violations, citing offenders and taking down signs.
βBased on my last campaigns, Iβd be surprised if there was a rapid response by the police because Iβve not found the police to really care when you call them to notify them about political signs,β he said. βThe campaign may actually be over by the time we saw a response.β
Stevens, however, said thatβs not what he intends β or even the way he said the bill is supposed to work.
βMy understanding is, if they put something in front of mine, I can pull it out,β he said, without bothering to wait for police.