Steve Keffer, retired paramedic and firefighter for Albuquerque Fire Department, administers a COVID-19 vaccine to a patient at Tucson Convention Center.

PHOENIX โ€” Companies that fire Arizona employees for refusing to get vaccinated against COVID could be required to continue paying them for a year.

The state House gave preliminary approval Monday to legislation that would make such payments automatic, though it would permit either a lump sum or installments. The only way for a firm to escape the financial hit would be to give the worker the job back โ€” but with a โ€œreasonable accommodationโ€™โ€™ to honor any claim of a religious exemption.

And the measure, House Bill 2198, which now awaits a roll-call vote before going to the Senate, would be retroactive, covering any who lost a job as long ago as December.

Rep. Steve Kaiser, R-Phoenix, said the payment is justified.

โ€œThey need time to find employment,โ€™โ€™ he said.

He said itโ€™s also a matter of civil rights. State and federal laws require employers to honor a workerโ€™s โ€œsincerely held religious beliefsโ€™โ€™ against getting vaccinated, he noted.

โ€œAnd theyโ€™re supposed to provide accommodations to their workers,โ€™โ€™ Kaiser said. Those usually take the form of options such as being placed separate from other workers, or working at home.

However, Kaiserโ€™s legislation doesnโ€™t mention the issue of workers having a religious reason for refusing the vaccine. And, as written, it would permit employees to object for any reason and, if denied some accommodation, demand a yearโ€™s worth of pay.

State lawmakers have proposed several measures to prohibit government agencies from requiring that workers be vaccinated.

Proposals to extend the same prohibition to private employers, however, have failed to win approval. Kaiserโ€™s measure would provide a work-around of sorts, with no ban but instead a financial disincentive.

Not all Republicans are pleased with the alternative.

Rep. David Cook, R-Globe, said if a company is violating state and federal law, as Kaiser contends, there is recourse through the courts where evidence can be presented.

Kaiser, however, said thatโ€™s not an acceptable option, especially when he said it puts an individual worker against โ€œone of these massive companies.โ€™โ€™

โ€œThatโ€™s going to be very expensive,โ€™โ€™ he said. โ€œItโ€™s going to be more than a year to finish that lawsuit.โ€™โ€™

Kaiser acknowledged there is the option of filing a civil rights complaint with the attorney generalโ€™s office, but he said that also doesnโ€™t solve the problem.

โ€œIt takes a long time,โ€™โ€™ he said. โ€œThe personโ€™s already been fired. There is no recourse. And they canโ€™t get another job in the industry.โ€™โ€™

Cook remained unconvinced, saying the measure runs contrary to Republican principles that say government should not set the work conditions of private employers.

Kaiser furnished Capitol Media Services with emails from people who told of being fired for refusing to get the vaccine.

Some of the complaints were from people who said they have โ€œnatural immunityโ€™โ€™ as a result of having previously had COVID, as well as those who contend the vaccine and the testing procedure are dangerous. But at least one person said he never asked for an exemption before being let go.


Become a #ThisIsTucson member! Your contribution helps our team bring you stories that keep you connected to the community. Become a member today.