Arizonans will get a bit more time to weigh in on proposed new science standards for high schools, including the bid by Arizona schools chief Diane Douglas to eliminate several references to “evolution.”
The move came after the program that takes comments on the Arizona Department of Education’s website crashed on Sunday and remained inoperable into Monday, which had been the final day for people to respond. The new deadline is now noon on Thursday.
Dan Godzich, spokesman for the Department of Education, said the state’s own “antiquated” computer system could not handle such wide-open surveys. So the agency instead turned to some outside software.
That, however, didn’t help, with Godzich saying it was unable to handle the multiple responses that were coming in.
A large number of the comments that managed to get recorded before the crash are specifically critical of changes that Douglas herself made in the standards which had been crafted by a review committee.
In one section, Douglas wants to eliminate requirements that students be able to evaluate how inherited traits in a population can lead to evolution. Instead, students would evaluate how inherited traits in a population can lead to “biological diversity.”
Elsewhere, Douglas seeks to repeal language that students develop the understanding of how “adaptations contribute to the process of biological evolution.” Instead that verbiage would read “how traits within populations change over time.”
And a reference to the “mechanism of biological evolution” would be supplanted with “change in genetic composition of a population over successive generations.”
Also gone would be any reference to the Big Bang theory of the creation of the universe.
Godzich said the comments, including those yet to be received, will be reviewed by the standards committee, which will make recommendations to Douglas. But he said what ultimately gets forwarded to the state Board of Education will be entirely up to her.
“She’s the elected official,” he said.
On Monday, Gov. Doug Ducey weighed in, saying he does not see a conflict between religion and evolution. More to the point, the governor said any discussion of alternatives, like “intelligent design,” should be left to classes on literature.
But Ducey’s comments were mild in comparison with some that came in through the website before it crashed.
“Stop denying our kids a full education with your religious agenda!!!” read one comment.
The synopsis of responses does not spell out who made them, though individuals actually need to identify themselves before they can comment.
“We should only be covering evolution in school,” reads another. “Creationism should be kept separate from schools.”
And another says that omitting the Big Bang theory “just makes you look stupid.”
Overall, in the 2,233 responses made before the system crashed, there were more than 700 references to evolution, though some were duplicate. And while the vast majority were critical of what Douglas was proposing, there were exceptions.
One person suggested that those revamping the standards view a DVD series from the Institute of Creation Research called “Understanding the Mysteries of Genesis.”
“This professionally produced series rationally and unemotionally presents the case for intelligent creation, with the author of that creation Jesus Christ,” the comment reads, saying the material does a respectable job of countermanding “de facto ‘standards’ of evolution and godless big bang theories.”
And another comment says schools should be open to the concept of “atomic biology.”
A website operated by the Atomic Biology Institute says it is based on the super-intelligent physical work necessary to find, sort, select, count and precisely place the right number of atoms to build and maintain all living cells.
“This is a Godly science,” the website reads, saying humankind lacks the intelligence to assemble the molecules needed by cells.
“Therefore, super intelligence (far greater than that of mankind), is essential to cause life,” the website rules. “That rules out Darwinism as the cause of life as they have no intelligence to use.”
Douglas has said she is not seeking to replace the teaching of evolution with creationism or its more modern counterpart of intelligent design despite her own personal belief that the latter should be taught in public schools.
