One thing about Chuck Huckelberry — he has a feel for power dynamics.
Right now, with his contract about to expire, he is in a powerful position.
We’re in the middle of a pandemic, and the county is in charge of the local response. Vaccine distribution is just ramping up.
He has a five-member Board of Supervisors coming with a majority who are new members: Matt Heinz in District 2, Adelita Grijalva in District 5 and Rex Scott in District 1.
As newcomers arriving mid-crisis, they could use some experienced leadership in county administration.
So what does Huckelberry do?
He drops into their first meeting a request for a new four-year contract and a $13,000-per-year raise.
In other words, they’ll just be getting their feet wet, holding their votes for a chair and vice chair. Then shortly thereafter at Tuesday’s meeting, they’ll be asked to hand the longtime county administrator another four years in office at more than $300,000 per year.
Clever.
Now, it’s true that Huckelberry’s last four-year contract expires this week, so this is the right time to start discussing whether they want to offer a new contract and what the terms should be. But it’s definitely not an apt time for the board to be jumping into a new commitment with the old administrator.
Huckelberry, by the way, was first hired as “interim Pima County manager” in December 1993, before the board made him the permanent hire the next year at a salary of $121,000. So he’s been leading the county for 27 years. To many people, the man they call “King Chuck” is the county administration, for better or worse.
I called around to the three new supervisors Monday to get a sense of their comfort level with taking this big vote in their first meeting. Grijalva didn’t return my message, and Scott said he didn’t want to talk about it, but Heinz said he isn’t very comfortable with the situation.
“I don’t see who could be,” he said. “Sixty percent of the board is new.”
“I think Pima County has done very well having someone with experience such as Chuck Huckelberry,” he added. “But this is a big decision, and we need to be sure we have all the information.”
The contract is not complicated, but it is generous, as Huckelberry’s contracts have been for years. At $302,000 per year now, Huckelberry is already one of the country’s best paid county administrators. The new contract would boost that base salary to $315,000.
His memo to the board requesting the pay increase doesn’t really justify it. He acknowledges that over the last four years, his base pay rose from $288,000 in 2017 to $302,000 now.
Then he says, “My previous base salary was established four years ago, and I have received the same salary adjustments as other county employees during the four-year period since the previous contract was approved. My present annual base compensation is near $302,000; hence my request for a base salary of $315,000.”
Huckelberry also routinely gets an additional 15 days per year of vacation and 15 days of sick leave beyond that normally afforded a Pima County employee with 20 years experience. And he is due to be paid all unused sick and vacation pay at the end of his contract — it’s a rich benefit.
The timing may be advantageous for Huckelberry, but it is also galling to some Pima County employees. Starting Dec. 21, under a proposal from Huckelberry, Pima County put 20% of its 7,000-person workforce on a stay-at-home order.
If they had leave to use, they could use it. But if they didn’t, they would probably be furloughed.
Huckelberry has also been very reticent to embrace telecommuting during the pandemic. He’s repeatedly limited its use even as other government and business entities went all-in.
So while the timing is good for Huckelberry, it’s tough for the board, and bordering on offensive for county employees.
At the start of this new era on the board, the members should assert their authority by doing nothing, or at least nothing dramatic, at Tuesday’s meeting.
Huckelberry can wait and work under the terms of the old contract for a while as the new members sort out what they want to do.
That will let them take some power back in this negotiation.
Photos: 2020 General Election in Pima County and Arizona
Ballot processing in Pima County
Updated
Ballot processing in Pima County
Updated
Ballot processing in Pima County
Updated
Ballot processing in Pima County
Updated
Ballot processing in PIma County
Updated
Ballot processing in PIma County
Updated
Ballot processing in PIma County
Updated
Ballot processing in PIma County
Updated
Ballot processing, Pima County
Updated
Ballot processing, Pima County
Updated
Ballot processing, Pima County
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election 2020 Senate Kelly
Updated
Election 2020 Senate Kelly
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election 2020 Arizona Voting
Updated
Election 2020 Arizona Voting
Updated
Election 2020 Arizona Voting
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election 2020 Arizona Voting
Updated
Election 2020 Arizona Voting
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election 2020 Arizona Voting
Updated
Election 2020 Arizona Voting
Updated
Election 2020 Arizona Voting
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election 2020 Arizona Voting
Updated
Election 2020 Arizona Voting
Updated
Election 2020 Arizona Voting
Updated
Election 2020 Arizona Voting
Updated
Election 2020 Arizona Voting
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Judge throws out lawsuit, finds no fraud or misconduct in Arizona election
Updated
PHOENIX — A judge tossed out a bid by the head of the Arizona Republican Party to void the election results that awarded the state’s 11 electoral votes to Democrat Joe Biden.
The two days of testimony produced in the case brought by GOP Chairwoman Kelli Ward produced no evidence of fraud or misconduct in how the vote was conducted in Maricopa County, said Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Randall Warner in his Friday ruling.
Warner acknowledged that there were some human errors made when ballots that could not be read by machines due to marks or other problems were duplicated by hand.
But he said that a random sample of those duplicated ballots showed an accuracy rate of 99.45%.
Warner said there was no evidence that the error rate, even if extrapolated to all the 27,869 duplicated ballots, would change the fact that Biden beat President Trump.
The judge also threw out charges that there were illegal votes based on claims that the signatures on the envelopes containing early ballots were not properly compared with those already on file.
He pointed out that a forensic document examiner hired by Ward’s attorney reviewed 100 of those envelopes.
And at best, Warner said, that examiner found six signatures to be “inconclusive,” meaning she could not testify that they were a match to the signature on file.
But the judge said this witness found no signs of forgery.
Finally, Warner said, there was no evidence that the vote count was erroneous. So he issued an order confirming the Arizona election, which Biden won with a 10,457-vote edge over Trump.
Federal court case remains to be heard
Friday’s ruling, however, is not the last word.
Ward, in anticipation of the case going against her, already had announced she plans to seek review by the Arizona Supreme Court.
And a separate lawsuit is playing out in federal court, which includes some of the same claims made here along with allegations of fraud and conspiracy.
That case, set for a hearing Tuesday, also seeks to void the results of the presidential contest.
It includes allegations that the Dominion Software voting equipment used by Maricopa County is unreliable and was programmed to register more votes for Biden than he actually got.
Legislative leaders call for audit but not to change election results
Along the same lines, Senate President Karen Fann and House Speaker Rusty Bowers on Friday called for an independent audit of the software and equipment used by Maricopa County in the just-completed election.
“There have been questions,” Fann said.
But she told Capitol Media Services it is not their intent to use whatever is found to overturn the results of the Nov. 3 election.
In fact, she said nothing in the Republican legislative leaders’ request for the inquiry alleges there are any “irregularities” in the way the election was conducted.
“At the very least, the confidence in our electoral system has been shaken because of a lot of claims and allegations,” Fann said. “So our No. 1 goal is to restore the confidence of our voters.”
Bowers specifically rejected calls by the Trump legal team that the Legislature come into session to void the election results, which were formally certified on Monday.
“The rule of law forbids us to do that,” he said.
In fact, Bowers pointed out, it was the Republican-controlled Legislature that enacted a law three years ago specifically requiring the state’s electors “to cast their votes for the candidates who received the most votes in the official statewide canvass.”
He said that was done because Hillary Clinton had won the popular vote nationwide in 2016 and some lawmakers feared that electors would refuse to cast the state’s 11 electoral votes for Trump, who won Arizona’s race that year.
“As a conservative Republican, I don’t like the results of the presidential election,” Bowers said in a prepared statement. “But I cannot and will not entertain a suggestion that we violate current law to change the outcome of a certified election.”