Willow Vista

A robust uptick in new-home permits may indicate a sustained return in the demand for new homes, like those in a Richmond American Homes subdivision in Marana.

PHOENIX โ€” Arizona continues its most rapid growth on the edges of its largest communities.

New figures released last week from the U.S. Census Bureau show Queen Creek grew a whopping 8.2 percent in the year ending June 30, 2016. Those are the most recent figures available from the federal agency.

Jim Chang, the state demographer, told Capitol Media Services this isnโ€™t some sort of mistake.

โ€œThat number is actually very real,โ€ he said, mirroring estimates he makes for the state Office of Economic Opportunity. โ€œItโ€™s actually growing pretty fast.โ€

Queen Creek, extending from the far southeast side of Maricopa County into Pinal County, has the advantage of being adjacent to a lot of vacant land. That makes it a prime opportunity for growth.

A similar situation exists on the other side of the Phoenix area, with Buckeye showing a 4.8 percent year-over-year growth.

The availability of land to grow also boosted the population of Marana by 3.6 percent in just one year and Apache Junction by 3.3 percent. Tucson, meanwhile, showed small population growth year over year.

For some other communities logging what appears to be rapid growth, there may be less there than meets the eye.

Take Casa Grande, which according to the Census Bureau grew by 3.3 percent.

Chang said there has been construction in the Pinal County community. But he said that a prior population estimate, based on housing construction reports, โ€œleft out a few hundred units.โ€

So the actual year-over-year increase may be less than what the new report shows. Still, the community is growing, with the new population figures 12.2 percent more than the 2010 census.

At the other extreme, the Census Bureau figures that Florence shed 691 residents. That translates out to a 2.6 percent population decline.

Chang said, though, that year-over-year changes in Florence may simply be linked to changes in prison population.

Hayden lost 1.7 percent of its residents, followed by Willcox at 1.5 percent, Tombstone at 1 percent and Huachuca City with a 0.9 percent drop.

The figures for Cochise County communities reflect the anemic economic situation in all of Cochise County. A separate report by the state Office of Economic Opportunity shows no overall job growth in the past 12 months, with the 300 new private-sector jobs being offset by an identical loss in government positions.

Chang said the numbers reflect the continued fallout from decisions made years ago by the military to redeploy some people stationed at Fort Huachuca. He said this has had a continuing ripple effect on not only Sierra Vista, but also on nearby communities.

The annual report is based on estimates done by the federal agency starting with the official decennial base counts of housing units and population.

Census Bureau staffers then update that each year to first reflect boundary changes. They then factor in households to come up with the each yearโ€™s mid-decade figures.

All this, of course, is subject to correction when the figures from the 2020 census, involving an actual count, are released in 2021.

But the interim figures provide at least some indication of where the state is growing โ€” or not.

That in turn, has important implications.

For example, cities get revenue sharing from the state based on population. With the amount of revenue-sharing dollars determined each year based on fixed formulas, that means more for the rapidly growing communities and less for those that do not grow as fast as the state average.

And there also can be political fallout.

The state is divided into 30 legislative districts, each supposedly with essentially equal population.

With a fixed number of House and Senate seats, that means more representatives coming to the Capitol from the most-populated areas. And that, in turn, means slow-growing areas โ€” particularly in rural counties โ€” will find themselves with fewer people to make their case in Phoenix.

Congressional representation is a bit trickier.

There are 435 seats in the U.S. House, apportioned by population. Arizonaโ€™s growth between 2000 and 2010 gained it a ninth seat.

If the stateโ€™s growth is sufficient, Arizona might have another member of Congress after 2020. That then involves redividing the state into 10 โ€” or possibly 11 โ€” equally populated congressional districts

By definition, the Census Bureau numbers are estimates. But the agency is not the only one keeping tabs, with Chang also doing similar counts for the Office of Economic Opportunity.

There are some differences.

Statewide, for example, the Census Bureau puts the June 30, 2016, population at 6,931,071. But Chang figures the actual state population on that date was about 95,000 less.

Thatโ€™s a difference of only about 1.4 percent.

But the ability to do accurate estimates for both the feds and the state get trickier as you move from statewide numbers to county figures and, ultimately, to cities and smaller towns.


Become a #ThisIsTucson member! Your contribution helps our team bring you stories that keep you connected to the community. Become a member today.

On Twitter: @azcapmedia

Census data

Field 1 Field 2 Field 3 Field 4 Field 5 Field 6
Community and type Est. 2015 Est. 2016 % change State OEO est. 2016 State v. Federal difference
Arizona 6,817,565 6,931,071 1.7% 6,835,518 -95,553
Apache Junction city 38,684 39,954 3.3% 39,118 -836
Avondale city 81,722 82,881 1.4% 80,073 -2,808
Benson city 4,904 4,870 -0.7% 4,981 111
Bisbee city 5,204 5,221 0.3% 5,312 91
Buckeye city 61,641 64,629 4.8% 65,509 880
Bullhead City city 39,713 39,970 0.6% 39,948 -22
Camp Verde town 11,158 11,238 0.7% 10,968 -270
Carefree town 3,656 3,724 1.9% 3,595 -129
Casa Grande city 52,816 54,534 3.3% 53,657 -877
Cave Creek town 5,412 5,476 1.2% 5,498 22
Chandler city 243,829 247,477 1.5% 250,547 3,070
Chino Valley town 11,085 11,250 1.5% 10,974 -276
Clarkdale town 4,204 4,272 1.6% 4,173 -99
Clifton town 3,682 3,734 1.4% 4,491 757
Colorado City town 4,808 4,818 0.2% 4,822 4
Coolidge city 12,220 12,528 2.5% 12,311 -217
Cottonwood city 11,697 11,990 2.5% 11,749 -241
Dewey-Humboldt town 3,990 4,049 1.5% 3,952 -97
Douglas city 16,693 16,604 -0.5% 16,897 293
Duncan town 800 804 0.5% 744 -60
Eagar town 4,898 4,988 1.8% 4,906 -82
El Mirage city 34,586 35,043 1.3% 33,814 -1,229
Eloy city 17,478 17,442 -0.2% 17,198 -244
Flagstaff city 70,088 71,459 2.0% 71,656 197
Florence town 26,470 25,779 -2.6% 25,679 -100
Fountain Hills town 24,204 24,482 1.1% 23,638 -844
Fredonia town 1,319 1,323 0.3% 1,334 11
Gila Bend town 2,051 2,071 1.0% 1,998 -73
Gilbert town 232,399 237,133 2.0% 239,931 2,798
Glendale city 243,208 245,895 1.1% 237,723 -8,172
Globe city 7,348 7,376 0.4% 7,488 112
Goodyear city 74,879 77,258 3.2% 78,189 931
Guadalupe town 6,257 6,336 1.3% 6,218 -118
Hayden town 646 635 -1.7% 644 9
Holbrook city 5,019 5,074 1.1% 5,120 46
Huachuca City town 1,760 1,744 -0.9% 1,781 37
Jerome town 452 455 0.7% 444 -11
Kearny town 2,023 2,075 2.6% 2,049 -26
Kingman city 28,774 29,029 0.9% 29,063 34
Lake Havasu City city 53,291 53,743 0.8% 53,796 53
Litchfield Park city 5,604 5,766 2.9% 6,188 422
Mammoth town 1,481 1,519 2.6% 1,497 -22
Marana town 41,950 43,474 3.6% 43,752 278
Maricopa city 46,111 46,903 1.7% 47,746 843
Mesa city 478,243 484,587 1.3% 467,532 -17,055
Miami town 1,776 1,781 0.3% 1,816 35
Nogales city 20,128 20,008 -0.6% 21,955 1,947
Oro Valley town 43,369 43,781 0.9% 43,648 -133
Page city 7,531 7,599 0.9% 7,607 8
Paradise Valley town 14,104 14,355 1.8% 13,930 -425
Parker town 3,036 3,026 -0.3% 3,149 123
Patagonia town 885 878 -0.8% 966 88
Payson town 15,306 15,476 1.1% 15,706 230
Peoria city 160,435 164,173 2.3% 166,340 2,167
Phoenix city 1,582,904 1,615,017 2.0% 1,560,020 -54,997
Pima town 2,517 2,505 -0.5% 2,532 27
Pinetop-Lakeside town 4,320 4,378 1.3% 4,402 24
Prescott city 41,603 42,513 2.2% 41,575 -938
Prescott Valley town 42,096 43,132 2.5% 42,130 -1,002
Quartzsite town 3,604 3,644 1.1% 3,819 175
Queen Creek town 32,824 35,524 8.2% 36,096 572
Safford city 9,651 9,604 -0.5% 9,358 -246
Sahuarita town 28,230 28,794 2.0% 28,425 -369
St. Johns city 3,492 3,568 2.2% 3,499 -69
San Luis city 31,568 32,148 1.8% 34,663 2,515
Scottsdale city 239,873 246,645 2.8% 237,969 -8,676
Sedona city 10,303 10,397 0.9% 10,255 -142
Show Low city 10,903 11,096 1.8% 11,176 80
Sierra Vista city 43,396 43,208 -0.4% 43,754 546
Snowflake town 5,670 5,764 1.7% 5,798 34
Somerton city 14,963 14,970 0.0% 15,881 911
South Tucson city 5,631 5,645 0.2% 5,635 -10
Springerville town 1,957 1,995 1.9% 1,971 -24
Star Valley town 2,273 2,287 0.6% 2,317 30
Superior town 2,923 2,999 2.6% 2,963 -36
Surprise city 130,157 132,677 1.9% 128,182 -4,495
Taylor town 4,154 4,217 1.5% 4,240 23
Tempe city 177,953 182,498 2.6% 176,584 -5,914
Thatcher town 4,978 5,027 1.0% 5,174 147
Tolleson city 7,099 7,178 1.1% 6,920 -258
Tombstone city 1,313 1,300 -1.0% 1,324 24
Tucson city 528,441 530,706 0.4% 529,989 -717
Tusayan town 585 591 1.0% 591 0
Wellton town 2,937 2,968 1.1% 3,119 151
Wickenburg town 6,901 7,115 3.1% 6,978 -137
Willcox city 3,564 3,511 -1.5% 3,589 78
Williams city 3,108 3,159 1.6% 3,217 58
Winkelman town 344 346 0.6% 350 4
Winslow city 9,595 9,754 1.7% 9,789 35
Youngtown town 6,695 6,759 1.0% 6,535 -224
Yuma city 93,717 94,906 1.3% 100,049 5,143