With the Santa Catalina Mountains as a backdrop, a golfer putts on the practice green near the clubhouse at the Oro Valley Community Center, 10555 N. La Canada Drive.

Oro Valley will have to decide whether to put about $5 million into its struggling golf operations to fix aging infrastructure and make significant changes to the community center that houses a restaurant, the town’s manager told council members.

Town Manager Mary Jacobs said without millions in additional investments — the city has already spent roughly $2.7 million in upgrades after it voted to acquire three courses, with 45 total holes, in 2014 — the town will have limited options to increase the financial outlook of its golf operations.

In December 2014, the Town Council voted 4-3 in favor of purchasing El Conquistador Country Club for $1 million, a deal that included a half-cent sales-tax increase to pay for the since-completed renovations to turn the club into a community center that is open to the public.

The Oro Valley Community Center has two 18-hole golf courses. The town also operates the Pusch Ridge Golf Course, which has nine holes.

“It is my professional opinion that pre-purchase financial/operational projections were overly optimistic in suggesting that initially needed capital investments in the aging facility and golf courses could be paid from the Community Center Fund,” Jacobs wrote in a recent memo to the Town Council. “The financial model was overly reliant on a projected increase in membership, something that did not transpire as expected.”

“This is very much a chicken-and-egg scenario. The condition of the facility and courses at the time of its purchase by the town necessitates further immediate investment in order to get the operations at a point where they can be sustainable within the fund.”

Officials expect that the golf operations this fiscal year are on track and will not require additional funds from the town’s general fund to operate.

However, there are a number of looming infrastructure issues facing the courses, including irrigation systems in all three courses that generally are past their useful life.

“The irrigation (systems are) inefficient, costly to maintain and likely leaking significantly,” Jacobs said.

The town spends about $1 million on water for the golf courses annually.

There were serious conversations about downsizing the two main golf courses from 36 holes to 27, but town officials believe the savings from reducing operations would not make up for the projected loss in revenue from fewer holes.

Rob DeMore, vice president of operations for Troon, a private golf management consultant, said the proposal to eliminate nine holes of golf from the main courses is problematic, as it would cost the city money upfront to reconfigure the courses and find new recreational uses for portions of the courses no longer used for golf.

Troon has operated the courses for the town for the last three years. It notes that projections show the current 36-hole configuration will continue to generate more revenue than the 27-hole option.

“There is an enormous competitive advantage to have two 18-hole golf courses,” DeMore told the council recently.

He said if the council backs a plan to reduce the number of holes from 36 to 27, it could lose as much as 35 percent of its revenue from golfers.

DeMore was less enthusiastic about the Pusch Ridge course, saying the number of rounds being played at the nine-hole course has largely been stagnant over the last three years and the course is expensive to operate, as it relies on potable water for irrigation.

The town has been discussing with HSL Properties, which owns the Hilton El Conquistador resort, about taking over the Pusch Ridge course. Jacobs said no final decision has been reached and the town has already budgeted for the next fiscal year to continue operations at Pusch Ridge.

Citing increased demand for the town’s recreational facilities, Jacobs discussed plans to increase indoor space at the community center’s clubhouse, home to The Overlook restaurant, which continues to lose money.

“The Overlook is just not viable anymore,” Jacobs told the council recently. The town projects the restaurant will lose $100,000 in the current fiscal cycle. The town solicited bids for a private business to take over the restaurant, but Jacobs said it did not get any offers.

The council was asked by Jacobs to consider converting the 5,282-square-foot restaurant, which features high ceilings and a loft-like view overlooking the golf course and surrounding Santa Catalina Mountains, into a recreational and fitness space.

The Garden Cafe on the ground floor of the community center could be expanded and turned into a self-serve bar and grill, eliminating table service. The change in the type of restaurant service with a limited menu would help reduce food and personnel costs, Jacobs said.

Councilman Steve Solomon said he mostly has been getting calls from residents and golfers who want the council to keep the two main 18-hole courses untouched, with concerns ranging from maintaining property values and keeping the courses in good condition.

Councilwoman Mary Snider said the council is looking at more than golf, stressing the changes to the community center will benefit the entire town.

A final decision on golf operations — including how to pay it for it — will be made in a few months, Jacobs said. At a recent meeting, the council leaned toward not making any changes to the two 18-hole courses but asked staff for more information.

In its first year of operation, the city had to shore up the golf enterprise with $863,000 from the general fund after putting in $2 million into the golf course and restaurant.

In the following cycle, fiscal year 2016-2017, the golf enterprise fund ended up $600,000 in the red.

Jacobs said that for the current fiscal year, which ends June 30, the enterprise will be revenue neutral .


Become a #ThisIsTucson member! Your contribution helps our team bring you stories that keep you connected to the community. Become a member today.

Contact reporter Joe Ferguson at jferguson@tucson.com or 573-4197. On Twitter: @JoeFerguson