PHOENIX โ A court-ordered inspection of more than 1,600 Arizona ballots cast in the general election found just nine with errors in the presidential race โ not enough to declare Donald Trump the winner here, even if that error rate ran through all similar ballots.
The disclosure came in a hearing on a lawsuit filed by state GOP Chair Kelli Ward, contesting the election results.
Wardโs attorney presented a series of witnesses Thursday who testified about seeing errors in how Maricopa County handled ballots that needed to be duplicated.
This happens when an entire ballot โ or some of the races on it โ is unreadable to automatic scanning equipment. That could be due to physical damage, stains or extraneous marks.
A bipartisan group of election workers then examines the ballot, attempts to ascertain the intent of the voter, and creates what is supposed to be a mirror ballot that can be fed through the machine.
The witnesses told Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Randall Warner they saw various errors in the process, with individuals and rescanning machines taking ballots that should have been marked for Trump and either re-marking them for Joe Biden or otherwise altering them so that Trump would not get the vote.
Mistakes occurred during duplication
Scott Jarrett, who works for the Maricopa County Recorderโs Office, testified that a review of the sample of more than 1,600 ballots showed there were some mistakes made by county workers in duplicating the originals, testified Scott Jarrett, who works for the Maricopa County Recorderโs Office.
But he said a review of a random sample of these duplicated ballots ordered by the court turned up just nine with errors.
Thatโs a crucial point.
Jarrett extrapolated that error rate out among the nearly 28,000 ballots that had to be duplicated in Maricopa County. And he said if that same error rate ran through all those duplicated ballots โ a point he is not conceding โ that would have given Trump 102 more votes.
Biden won Maricopa County by more than 45,000 votes.
He also told the judge that even when there were errors, no vote for Trump was awarded to Biden. Similarly, he said, votes intended for Biden that were improperly re-marked on ballots did not wind up in Trumpโs tally.
Jarrett also testified that none of the machines that tallied the ballots are connected to the internet where some outsider could alter the results, and that the equipment and software used in the county was reviewed and certified.
โNo varianceโ
In a bid to show the accuracy of the entire process, Jarrett detailed for Warner the steps taken in a legally required random hand count.
Thatโs where a sample of ballots chosen by officials of both parties is manually reviewed to see how the results compare with what the machines tallied. He said there was โno varianceโ between the hand review and the machine count.
It will be up to Warner to make the final decision of whether there were sufficient errors to throw the returns into doubt, particularly for the presidential race.
Ward hopes to persuade Warner to toss out the results. That, in turn, could throw the issue to the Republican-controlled Legislature to decide who gets the stateโs 11 electoral votes โ the votes that the certified election results said should go to Biden.
Warner earlier Thursday threw out another part of Wardโs claim that Republican observers were not able to adequately see what was going on in the vote counting, the duplication of damaged ballots, and the comparison of on-file signatures with those on ballot envelopes.
The judge said the allegation came too late.
โClaims of insufficient opportunity to observe those procedures should have been brought when there was an opportunity to correct any violation of Arizona law, if there was a violation,โ the judge said. That could have led to an order for more access while ballots were actually being counted, Warner said.
But what Ward now wants, the judge said, is โto upend the entire election.โ
Federal court hearing to be set in separate suit
Separately, Ward and others who would have been the electors for President Trump were in federal court Thursday with their list of allegations about election irregularities.
They most immediately want U.S. District Judge Diane Humetewa to issue a restraining order preventing the 11 Democratic electors from casting their ballots for Biden as scheduled on Dec. 14.
That would give their attorney, Howard Kleinhendler, time to present evidence of what he claims is fraud in how the election was conducted.
Kleinhendler also wants the judge to order the seizure of all voting machines, software, ballot return envelopes, paper ballots and other election materials. He contends the system used by Maricopa County was deliberately programmed to add votes to Biden and that early ballots were counted that may not have come from registered voters.
But Justin Nelson, representing Secretary of State Katie Hobbs, pointed out to the judge that the lawsuit names Hobbs and Gov. Doug Ducey as the only defendants. But what Kleinhender wants is in the hands of Maricopa County, which is not named as a defendant in the lawsuit.
Humetewa said she will schedule a hearing for this coming week.
In both cases, the lawsuits focus only on the top of the ticket.
Republicans did fairly well in most other races, holding their own in the Arizona House and losing only one seat in the state Senate.
The only other key race where the GOP candidate came up short was the defeat of incumbent Martha McSally in the U.S. Senate race. But the margin of victory for Democrat Mark Kelly was nearly 78,000, versus the 10,457 edge that Biden tallied over Trump.
Photos: 2020 General Election in Pima County and Arizona
Ballot processing in Pima County
Updated
Ballot processing in Pima County
Updated
Ballot processing in Pima County
Updated
Ballot processing in Pima County
Updated
Ballot processing in PIma County
Updated
Ballot processing in PIma County
Updated
Ballot processing in PIma County
Updated
Ballot processing in PIma County
Updated
Ballot processing, Pima County
Updated
Ballot processing, Pima County
Updated
Ballot processing, Pima County
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election 2020 Senate Kelly
Updated
Election 2020 Senate Kelly
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election 2020 Arizona Voting
Updated
Election 2020 Arizona Voting
Updated
Election 2020 Arizona Voting
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election 2020 Arizona Voting
Updated
Election 2020 Arizona Voting
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election 2020 Arizona Voting
Updated
Election 2020 Arizona Voting
Updated
Election 2020 Arizona Voting
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election 2020 Arizona Voting
Updated
Election 2020 Arizona Voting
Updated
Election 2020 Arizona Voting
Updated
Election 2020 Arizona Voting
Updated
Election 2020 Arizona Voting
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Judge throws out lawsuit, finds no fraud or misconduct in Arizona election
Updated
PHOENIX โ A judge tossed out a bid by the head of the Arizona Republican Party to void the election results that awarded the stateโs 11 electoral votes to Democrat Joe Biden.
The two days of testimony produced in the case brought by GOP Chairwoman Kelli Ward produced no evidence of fraud or misconduct in how the vote was conducted in Maricopa County, said Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Randall Warner in his Friday ruling.
Warner acknowledged that there were some human errors made when ballots that could not be read by machines due to marks or other problems were duplicated by hand.
But he said that a random sample of those duplicated ballots showed an accuracy rate of 99.45%.
Warner said there was no evidence that the error rate, even if extrapolated to all the 27,869 duplicated ballots, would change the fact that Biden beat President Trump.
The judge also threw out charges that there were illegal votes based on claims that the signatures on the envelopes containing early ballots were not properly compared with those already on file.
He pointed out that a forensic document examiner hired by Wardโs attorney reviewed 100 of those envelopes.
And at best, Warner said, that examiner found six signatures to be โinconclusive,โ meaning she could not testify that they were a match to the signature on file.
But the judge said this witness found no signs of forgery.
Finally, Warner said, there was no evidence that the vote count was erroneous. So he issued an order confirming the Arizona election, which Biden won with a 10,457-vote edge over Trump.
Federal court case remains to be heard
Fridayโs ruling, however, is not the last word.
Ward, in anticipation of the case going against her, already had announced she plans to seek review by the Arizona Supreme Court.
And a separate lawsuit is playing out in federal court, which includes some of the same claims made here along with allegations of fraud and conspiracy.
That case, set for a hearing Tuesday, also seeks to void the results of the presidential contest.
It includes allegations that the Dominion Software voting equipment used by Maricopa County is unreliable and was programmed to register more votes for Biden than he actually got.
Legislative leaders call for audit but not to change election results
Along the same lines, Senate President Karen Fann and House Speaker Rusty Bowers on Friday called for an independent audit of the software and equipment used by Maricopa County in the just-completed election.
โThere have been questions,โ Fann said.
But she told Capitol Media Services it is not their intent to use whatever is found to overturn the results of the Nov. 3 election.
In fact, she said nothing in the Republican legislative leadersโ request for the inquiry alleges there are any โirregularitiesโ in the way the election was conducted.
โAt the very least, the confidence in our electoral system has been shaken because of a lot of claims and allegations,โ Fann said. โSo our No. 1 goal is to restore the confidence of our voters.โ
Bowers specifically rejected calls by the Trump legal team that the Legislature come into session to void the election results, which were formally certified on Monday.
โThe rule of law forbids us to do that,โ he said.
In fact, Bowers pointed out, it was the Republican-controlled Legislature that enacted a law three years ago specifically requiring the stateโs electors โto cast their votes for the candidates who received the most votes in the official statewide canvass.โ
He said that was done because Hillary Clinton had won the popular vote nationwide in 2016 and some lawmakers feared that electors would refuse to cast the stateโs 11 electoral votes for Trump, who won Arizonaโs race that year.
โAs a conservative Republican, I donโt like the results of the presidential election,โ Bowers said in a prepared statement. โBut I cannot and will not entertain a suggestion that we violate current law to change the outcome of a certified election.โ