This reckoning has been coming for a long time.

For years, white nationalists have been trying to leverage their way into the mainstream of American politics, especially in the GOP.

Now Arizona has a state senator bold or crazy enough to say thatโ€™s exactly what sheโ€™s doing, so we canโ€™t avoid dealing with Sen. Wendy Rogers. The Senate did so by censuring her on Tuesday.

But whatโ€™s harder is to confront the tendencies she represents โ€” not just white nationalism, but also the dangerous demonization of the political opposition โ€” and the political cynicism that empowers them.

Rogers hails from the Phoenix area, but after shopping for districts and losing elections for years, she now represents an area in north-central Arizona, Legislative District 6, and claims Flagstaff as her home. In the Tucson area, people may remember her as the Republican nominee who lost to Democrat Tom Oโ€™Halloran in the 2018 general election in Congressional District 1.

Since winning election to the state Senate in 2020, Rogers has been steadily ramping up her rhetoric and overtly trying to pull Republicans to the racist, anti-Semitic right.

โ€œThere is whatโ€™s called the Overton Window of political acceptability. And we have to move it inch by inch, day by day,โ€ she said in an interview.

Toward what? Rogers said in a Feb. 23 tweet sheโ€™s simply pushing politics โ€œtoward Christ, America First, Freedom and our Founding Documents.โ€

Donโ€™t believe her.

'Build more gallows'

During her time in the Senate, Rogers has become a star to the emboldened white nationalist movement.

She has embraced Nick Fuentes, who has repeatedly expressed white supremacist and antisemitic views. In June, the Anti-Defamation League reported, he tweeted, โ€œIf you are a White male zoomer, remember that the people in power hate you and your unborn children and they will try to genocide you in your lifetime.โ€

His Twitter account has since been suspended.

Fuentes also founded the America First Political Action Conference, a further right version of the Conservative Political Action Conference, or CPAC.

Rogers spoke to Fuentesโ€™ conference last week, praising him as โ€œthe most persecuted man in America.โ€ Speaking at the same conference, Fuentes noted people are comparing Vladimir Putin to Hitler, adding โ€œand they say thatโ€™s not a good thing.โ€

Wink, wink.

Speaking by video feed to the conference, Rogers said: โ€œWe need to build more gallows. If we try some of these high-level criminals, convict them, and use a newly built set of gallows, itโ€™ll make an example of these traitors whoโ€™ve betrayed our country.โ€

What traitors? It hardly matters. This kind of demonization is typical in the ideological zone that Rogers inhabits. She and Rep. Mark Finchem, the Oro Valley Republican, regularly refer to anyone who opposes them as โ€œcommunists.โ€ U.S. Rep. Paul Gosar has also spoken to the America First conference and voiced much the same rhetoric.

Rogers tweeted Tuesday morning, โ€œtoday is the day where we find out if the Communists in the GOP throw the sweet grandma under the bus for being white.โ€

She added in a steady flow of posts, โ€œSoros is a problem and anyone who sides with him over me is an enemy of the Republic.โ€

She said of the Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who is Jewish: โ€œZelensky (sic) is a globalist puppet for Soros and the Clintons.โ€

'Eliminationist' rhetoric spreads

The thing is, it isnโ€™t just her resorting to this escalating rhetoric. Blake Masters, the candidate from Tucson for the GOP nomination for U.S. Senate, also has embodied this tendency in his campaign statements.

โ€œThe left hates white people,โ€ he tweeted last year. โ€œThey want you to believe that violence in the name of โ€˜Black Lives Matterโ€™ should be excused.โ€

โ€œWhenโ€™s the last time you heard a leftist say anything good at all about our country,โ€ Masters said in a recent video. โ€œIf it were up to them, we wouldnโ€™t even exist.โ€

This sort of talk is close to whatโ€™s sometimes called โ€œeliminationismโ€ โ€” the idea that oneโ€™s political opponents pose an existential threat to the home country or culture and must be excised from the body politic or even killed.

Itโ€™s led to genocide elsewhere, and itโ€™s worryingly common these days in the USA. But it flourishes because it keeps people in power.

Gov. Doug Ducey acknowledged this last week in a frank response to a question by Jeremy Duda of the Arizona Mirror. Duda noted that an independent-expenditure group Ducey controls put nearly $500,000 toward helping Rogers win in 2020 and asked โ€œare you still happy with that investment and do you think that was a good decision?โ€

Duceyโ€™s response was frighteningly pragmatic, to the point of amoral cynicism.

โ€œWhat I need as a governor are governing majorities so I can pass dollars into our social safety net. So we can provide programs like this that will help children from around our state. The fact that we can put budgets that put $8.67 billion in K-12 education.โ€

โ€œThatโ€™s what I wanted is to move my agenda forward. Iโ€™m proud of what weโ€™ve been able to accomplish. And sheโ€™s still better than her opponent, Felicia French.โ€

Incentives for extremism

Certainly heโ€™s right that having a Republican majority makes it easier to pass his agenda, but itโ€™s ridiculous to suggest that Rogersโ€™ opponent, Felicia French, wouldnโ€™t have wanted as much or more social and education spending.

When he says โ€œmy agenda,โ€ the top priority has always been tax cuts, especially those helping the wealthy.

And the way he specified the name of Rogersโ€™ opponent was strange. He actually did it twice in his longer answer. French is a moderate Democrat who spent her career in the Army as a nurse and helicopter pilot, retiring as a colonel. Now she works on the Navajo reservation in Tuba City.

During the campaign, Peter Aleshire reported in the White Mountain Independent that โ€œFrench has largely refrained from criticizing Rogers, instead focusing on a platform that calls for more spending on educational reforms, stronger action to slow the spread of COVID-19 and stronger environmental regulations.โ€

So, in fact, Ducey and the corporations who subsidized his independent expenditure campaign elevated a candidate renowned for her rhetorical extremism at the expense of a qualified, restrained candidate. They did it to help Ducey accomplish his โ€œagenda,โ€ though certainly not education spending and the social safety net.

Rogers even got a favor from Republicans on the Arizona Redistricting Commission, it appears. Shereen Lerner, a Democrat on the commission, accused David Mehl, a commission Republican from Tucson, of proposing a last-minute shift of legislative borders to move Rogers out of a Dem-friendly district and into a Republican one.

So censuring Rogers, as the Senate did Tuesday, perhaps sets some very loose guardrails for the most extreme rhetoric. But the incentives that put Rogers where she is remain in place.

White supremacy, antisemitism, eliminationism will remain strong as long as the power structure and the voters reward it.


Become a #ThisIsTucson member! Your contribution helps our team bring you stories that keep you connected to the community. Become a member today.

Contact columnist Tim Steller at tsteller@tucson.com or 520-807-7789. On Twitter: @senyorreporter