Sarah Garrecht Gassen

So. How are you feeling today โ€“ about your life, our community, the country?

Iโ€™ve been feeling a bit meh, myself.

Weโ€™re in unsettling times. This happens every presidential election, because itโ€™s our time to take stock and think about the future. Weโ€™re supposed to weigh possibilities and evaluate potential leaders from a group of qualified candidates.

The undercurrent of hopelessness I sense, and maybe Iโ€™m projecting here, but itโ€™s tied to the rise of Donald Trump. The realization that so many Americans agree with this sexist, racist and vapid con man is downright depressing. Add on the realization that Texas Sen. Ted Cruz is seen as the โ€œreasonableโ€ and Republican mainstream alternative and weโ€™re in angst overload territory.

On the Democratic side the animus is more personal between the two candidatesโ€™ supporters. Allegiances have been made to Bernie Sanders or Hillary Clinton, and thatโ€™s become a litmus test, even among friends. Value judgments and assumptions are made about the people in the otherโ€™s camp, and things get nasty fast. The bigger goal is lost in personal pettiness.

In Arizona weโ€™re facing a decision on Prop. 123, the measure that would get some more money into public schools in the near term, but at a long-term price.

People who are usually on the same side of issues, particularly on education, are divided. The quarrel isnโ€™t over whether schools need, and legally are entitled to, more funding โ€” the disagreement is over whether Prop. 123 is the way to get it done. The proposition would settle a lawsuit over the Legislatureโ€™s elimination of inflation funding for schools, which back in 2000 voters mandated be paid.

Alternatives to properly fund schools are out there, proposed by Prop. 123 opponents, including state Treasurer Jeff DeWit and supported by a number of prominent Democrats.

That alliance brings together odd bedfellows โ€” DeWit is the Arizona campaign chair for Trump. But for this, theyโ€™re on the same side. Thatโ€™s encouraging.

But even if the alternatives are the most brilliant ideas ever, theyโ€™re not on the table. Theyโ€™re not an option, and rejecting Prop. 123 as a fulcrum to get the Republicans to support something better is a losing bet.

My dadโ€™s mom had a thing sheโ€™d say about circumstances out of her control, like the weather or the bus running late: โ€œEh, but what are you gonna do?โ€ It was more of a figure of speech, I thought, but itโ€™s evolved into a real question.

I acknowledge the discord in my position on Prop. 123. Itโ€™s a bad deal. But thereโ€™s no other way, in the near term, to change the atmosphere at the Capitol enough to get significantly more money into public schools.

We need to harness the energy from the presidential campaign into local politics, and to make changes in the Arizona Legislature. Get more Republicans to vote in their primaries, so better candidates end up in the general election. There are ways to improve the system, but they require the long game, and thatโ€™s hard to sustain.

Iโ€™ve said it before โ€“ itโ€™s easy to get discouraged about politics in Arizona. But the Prop. 123 discussion has created some alliances between people who donโ€™t have much else in common.

That, at the very least, is a good start.


Become a #ThisIsTucson member! Your contribution helps our team bring you stories that keep you connected to the community. Become a member today.

Sarah Garrecht Gassen writes opinion for the Arizona Daily Star. Email her at sgassen@tucson.com and follow her on Facebook.