PHOENIX — Gov. Doug Ducey is apparently off the legal hook over comments he made in a phone call from his office to business owners and managers urging that they try to defeat Proposition 208.
Michael Catlett, the state’s deputy solicitor general, said there is no question but that Ducey, in a conference call in September with some members of the business community, argued that the 3.5% surcharge on incomes above $250,000 for individuals and $500,000 for married couples filing jointly to help fund public education would be “a small business killer.”
In the same conversation from his office, Ducey argued that the dollars raised “won’t get to the classroom, and they won’t benefit our teachers.” And he encouraged those on the call to “go directly to the (web) site” of foes of Proposition 208 and “please help spread the word.”
But Catlett, responding to a complaint filed by the attorney for the pro-208 Invest in Education Committee, said the governor did not violate laws that prohibit the use of public resource to influence an election. And he said the attorney general’s office will not pursue the matter.
It starts, Catlett said, with another section of that same law that says it does not deny the civil and political liberties guaranteed in the state and federal constitution. That, he said, entitles Ducey to speak on any “matter of public concern.”
Catlett also said it is irrelevant that the governor made his statements during a work day.
He said the only relevant consideration is whether he used “public resources.” And Catlett said the use of the state’s phone equipment is “incidental.”
Finally, he noted that this was not a call the governor was making specifically to stir up opposition to the initiative.
“Here, the (Invest in Education) Committee has not alleged that the topic of the governor’s conference call — the state of business in Arizona — was improper,” Catlett wrote.
“The committee has submitted no evidence that the state expended additional resources because the governor responded to a question from a constituent about his view on a matter of public concern,” he continued. “Thus, it appears that whatever public resources were expended because of that response would have been expended regardless of whether the governor was communicating about a ballot measure.”
Voters approved the measure with 51.75% of the votes.
Since that time, business groups that tried to keep it off the ballot in the first place have filed a new lawsuit arguing constitutional and legal infirmities. But Maricopa County Superior Court Judge John Hannah Jr. has so far rebuffed legal efforts to keep the levy from taking effect.
Photos: 2020 General Election in Pima County and Arizona
Ballot processing in Pima County
Updated
Ballot processing in Pima County
Updated
Ballot processing in Pima County
Updated
Ballot processing in Pima County
Updated
Ballot processing in PIma County
Updated
Ballot processing in PIma County
Updated
Ballot processing in PIma County
Updated
Ballot processing in PIma County
Updated
Ballot processing, Pima County
Updated
Ballot processing, Pima County
Updated
Ballot processing, Pima County
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election 2020 Senate Kelly
Updated
Election 2020 Senate Kelly
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election 2020 Arizona Voting
Updated
Election 2020 Arizona Voting
Updated
Election 2020 Arizona Voting
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election 2020 Arizona Voting
Updated
Election 2020 Arizona Voting
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election 2020 Arizona Voting
Updated
Election 2020 Arizona Voting
Updated
Election 2020 Arizona Voting
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election 2020 Arizona Voting
Updated
Election 2020 Arizona Voting
Updated
Election 2020 Arizona Voting
Updated
Election 2020 Arizona Voting
Updated
Election 2020 Arizona Voting
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Election Day, Pima County and Arizona, 2020
Updated
Judge throws out lawsuit, finds no fraud or misconduct in Arizona election
Updated
PHOENIX — A judge tossed out a bid by the head of the Arizona Republican Party to void the election results that awarded the state’s 11 electoral votes to Democrat Joe Biden.
The two days of testimony produced in the case brought by GOP Chairwoman Kelli Ward produced no evidence of fraud or misconduct in how the vote was conducted in Maricopa County, said Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Randall Warner in his Friday ruling.
Warner acknowledged that there were some human errors made when ballots that could not be read by machines due to marks or other problems were duplicated by hand.
But he said that a random sample of those duplicated ballots showed an accuracy rate of 99.45%.
Warner said there was no evidence that the error rate, even if extrapolated to all the 27,869 duplicated ballots, would change the fact that Biden beat President Trump.
The judge also threw out charges that there were illegal votes based on claims that the signatures on the envelopes containing early ballots were not properly compared with those already on file.
He pointed out that a forensic document examiner hired by Ward’s attorney reviewed 100 of those envelopes.
And at best, Warner said, that examiner found six signatures to be “inconclusive,” meaning she could not testify that they were a match to the signature on file.
But the judge said this witness found no signs of forgery.
Finally, Warner said, there was no evidence that the vote count was erroneous. So he issued an order confirming the Arizona election, which Biden won with a 10,457-vote edge over Trump.
Federal court case remains to be heard
Friday’s ruling, however, is not the last word.
Ward, in anticipation of the case going against her, already had announced she plans to seek review by the Arizona Supreme Court.
And a separate lawsuit is playing out in federal court, which includes some of the same claims made here along with allegations of fraud and conspiracy.
That case, set for a hearing Tuesday, also seeks to void the results of the presidential contest.
It includes allegations that the Dominion Software voting equipment used by Maricopa County is unreliable and was programmed to register more votes for Biden than he actually got.
Legislative leaders call for audit but not to change election results
Along the same lines, Senate President Karen Fann and House Speaker Rusty Bowers on Friday called for an independent audit of the software and equipment used by Maricopa County in the just-completed election.
“There have been questions,” Fann said.
But she told Capitol Media Services it is not their intent to use whatever is found to overturn the results of the Nov. 3 election.
In fact, she said nothing in the Republican legislative leaders’ request for the inquiry alleges there are any “irregularities” in the way the election was conducted.
“At the very least, the confidence in our electoral system has been shaken because of a lot of claims and allegations,” Fann said. “So our No. 1 goal is to restore the confidence of our voters.”
Bowers specifically rejected calls by the Trump legal team that the Legislature come into session to void the election results, which were formally certified on Monday.
“The rule of law forbids us to do that,” he said.
In fact, Bowers pointed out, it was the Republican-controlled Legislature that enacted a law three years ago specifically requiring the state’s electors “to cast their votes for the candidates who received the most votes in the official statewide canvass.”
He said that was done because Hillary Clinton had won the popular vote nationwide in 2016 and some lawmakers feared that electors would refuse to cast the state’s 11 electoral votes for Trump, who won Arizona’s race that year.
“As a conservative Republican, I don’t like the results of the presidential election,” Bowers said in a prepared statement. “But I cannot and will not entertain a suggestion that we violate current law to change the outcome of a certified election.”