6 more restaurants failed June health inspections; several pass follow-ups
- Updated
Six Tucson eateries failed health inspections in June; several passed follow-up inspections.
- Murphy Woodhouse Arizona Daily Star
- Updated
In June:
History: Since September 2015, has received only ratings of excellent.
What the inspector saw: Six critical violations on June 3, earning the restaurant a âprobationaryâ rating. These included improper food cooling and handling practices, a meat saw âencrusted with meat debris,â dishes being washed but not sanitized, and inadequate labeling of food. Additionally, several roaches were seen coming out of the floor sink.
Follow-up: While all of the violations were resolved by the June 13 follow-up inspection, the store did not pay its reinspection fee, which resulted in a failed inspection.
Response: Several attempts to contact the store for comment were unsuccessful.Â
- Murphy Woodhouse Arizona Daily Star
- Updated
In June:
History: Since 2002, the restaurant has exclusively received ratings of good and excellent. These were its first failed inspections.
What the inspector saw: On June 3, there was no hand sink in the server area, resulting in a âneeds improvementâ rating. That rating is for restaurants where inspectors find fewer than five critical violations that cannot be resolved immediately.
Follow-up: The restaurant failed two follow-up inspections in June because no sink had been installed, but passed a July 6 inspection.
Response: An owner didnât return a message seeking comment.Â
- Murphy Woodhouse Arizona Daily Star
- Updated
In June:
History: This was the restaurantâs first routine inspection.
What the inspector saw: Eight critical violations, including foods kept at unsafe temps, an employee slicing lemons with bare hands, improper food storage, seashells being used to serve meat products, inconsistent date marking, and raw sushi fish served without a consumer advisory posted.
Follow-up: The restaurant passed a July 1 reinspection.
Response: Jenny Lu, a Joy Buffet manager, said the violations have been corrected and that the inspector âsat down with me personally, and he taught me how to do everything.âÂ
- Murphy Woodhouse Arizona Daily Star
- Updated
In June:
History: Since 2014, the meat market has had three good ratings. This was its first failed inspection.
What the inspector saw: Six critical violations on June 22, including unsafe food temperatures, raw oysters stored above canned drinks, beans stored next to raw meat, an employeeâs personal drink being stored in an ice machine, improper labeling of shellfish and unsafe storage of cleaning products. Many of the violations were dealt with on-site.
Follow-up: Passed a July 6 reinspection.
Response: Owner Claudia Gonzalez said none of the violations put customers at risk and that they have all been resolved.Â
- Murphy Woodhouse Arizona Daily Star
- Updated
In June:
History: Has received mostly good ratings since 2013, but has failed one other time and received one âneeds improvementâ rating.
What the inspector saw: Six critical violations on June 23, earning the restaurant a probationary rating. Violations included poor hand-washing practices, raw food being stored near ready-to-eat food, fried chicken being stored in a used cardboard box, seasoning and sauce containers covered in encrusted food, food without proper date labeling, and an unlabeled pink liquid.
Follow-up: A reinspection was not done within 10 days of the failed inspection, as is customary, because the restaurant is closed until July 14. A reinspection will be done after it reopens, according to a health department official.
Response: The restaurant was closed the week the Star tried to reach owners or managers for comment.Â
- Murphy Woodhouse Arizona Daily Star
- Updated
In June:
History: Since 2008, this location has received exclusively good and excellent ratings.
What the inspector saw: This failed inspection stems from a March inspection in which an inspector saw there was no hand-washing station for a recently installed growler-filling station, resulting in a âneeds improvementâ rating. On June 23, a hand-washing station had still not been installed. The store is considering removing the growler-filling station, but if it is to remain, the store will need to submit plans to install a hand-washing sink.
Follow-up: There are no records of another follow-up.
Response: A company representative did not respond to requests for comment.
- By Murphy Woodhouse Arizona Daily Star
- Updated
In June:
Too-cool chicken and not-cool-enough pizza ingredients helped earn Claim Jumperâs Tucson restaurant a âprobationaryâ rating from the county health department.
On Tuesday, June 7, a county inspector found chicken cooked to under the mandated 165 degrees and a number of pizza ingredients kept at well over the 41 degrees required for potentially hazardous foods. The inspector also saw an employee handle a garbage can and then return to work without washing his hands; food prep utensils with âdry food debris;â and cutting boards being cleaned but not sanitized as required.
Most of the violations were corrected on site with the inspector present, according to a county report.
Probationary status is given when five or more critical violations are found at a restaurant. If critical violations are still present at a follow-up inspection within 10 days, the restaurant âfails.â
Since 2005, Claim Jumper, at 3761 E. Broadway, consistently received âgoodâ and âexcellentâ ratings, and this inspection was the first it failed.
Claim Jumper Senior Vice President Terry Turney said, âUnfortunately, on the day of the inspection, our staff did not adhere to our high standards, which is totally unacceptable. All violations were corrected on-site during the inspection. We will continue to work closely with the Health Department to ensure that the highest measures of sanitation and safety are maintained for our guests.â
- By Murphy Woodhouse Arizona Daily Star
- Updated
Inadequate cooling of potentially hazardous foods got the Tanque Verde Swap Meetâs Mercado briefly shut down on June 10.
A county health inspector found that the two walk-in coolers on-site âare not capable of holding food at 41 degrees or less.â
Instead, hot dogs, cheese and beans and other food were found to be 50 degrees or warmer. Additionally, the temperature alarm had been sounding for several hours the day of the visit, indicating unsafe temperatures, and âfood service continuedâ nevertheless, according to the inspection report.
The inspector found an additional five critical violations, which earned the cafeteria a âprobationaryâ rating.
County staff visited the facility the next day and determined that the coolers were functioning properly, and keeping food below required temperatures.
âFacility is OK to do full menu service at this time,â the June 11 follow-up report reads, though it goes on to advise managers to âcontinue to monitor refrigeration, especially since monsoons are here.â
Beyond the cooler violations, the inspector observed an employee handling food with her bare hands, raw meat being stored above ready-to-eat food and a nonfunctioning dish sanitizer, all of which were corrected that day.
A statement provided by the swap meetâs operators says that they have âoperated 10 different concessions and drink stands for over 40 years and this is the only incident that has ever closed a stand. It was immediately rectified and the Health Department cleared us to open the next day.â
Additionally, the âemployee in questionâ for some of the violations will take a county-administered food management course.
âWe are confident this will not recur,â it goes on to say.
This is the restaurantâs first failed inspection, and it has received ratings of âgoodâ and âexcellentâ exclusively since 2000.
Normally follow-up inspections at failed facilities are conducted within 10 days of the inspection. However, because the Mercado is only open on the weekends, the visit is scheduled for Friday, June 24, a county spokeswoman said.
- By Murphy Woodhouse Arizona Daily Star
- Updated
Inadequate hand-washing practices and unsanitary meat handling, among other violations, earned local chain BK Tacosâ North First Avenue location a âprobationaryâ rating from the county health department Wednesday.
The county inspector found eight critical violations, most of which were resolved or addressed on-site.
The inspector found meats kept below established temperatures for hot food, observed a BK employee handle a garbage can with gloves and then clean them off with dishwashing sprayer before returning to work, the same employee washing hands without soap, and cooked ribs ready for eating being placed on a cutting board covered with raw meat juices.
Additionally, the dish sanitizer tested negative for sanitizer three times, some food was stored without dates, and several bottles of cleaning supplies were stored without proper labeling.
Daphne Diaz, a BK shift supervisor, said the problems, which she described as âminor,â are âalready fixed.â She added that a re-inspection is scheduled for Monday, and that all of the restaurantâs staff have been registered for the next available food safety class in July âso that this doesnât happen anymore.â
The BK location, at 2680 N. First Ave., has received mostly âgoodâ and âexcellentâ ratings since 2006, though it has received two âneeds improvementâ ratings. The most recent inspection was its first âprobationaryâ rating, which was until recently known as a âprovisionalâ rating.
- Murphy Woodhouse Arizona Daily Star
- Updated
4,600:Â Food service licenses in Pima County
708:Â Excellent, good or passed inspections in June
25:Â Needs improvement inspections in June
9:Â Provisional and failed inspections in June
Source: Pima County Health Department
- Murphy Woodhouse Arizona Daily Star
In June:
History: Since September 2015, has received only ratings of excellent.
What the inspector saw: Six critical violations on June 3, earning the restaurant a âprobationaryâ rating. These included improper food cooling and handling practices, a meat saw âencrusted with meat debris,â dishes being washed but not sanitized, and inadequate labeling of food. Additionally, several roaches were seen coming out of the floor sink.
Follow-up: While all of the violations were resolved by the June 13 follow-up inspection, the store did not pay its reinspection fee, which resulted in a failed inspection.
Response: Several attempts to contact the store for comment were unsuccessful.Â
- Murphy Woodhouse Arizona Daily Star
In June:
History: Since 2002, the restaurant has exclusively received ratings of good and excellent. These were its first failed inspections.
What the inspector saw: On June 3, there was no hand sink in the server area, resulting in a âneeds improvementâ rating. That rating is for restaurants where inspectors find fewer than five critical violations that cannot be resolved immediately.
Follow-up: The restaurant failed two follow-up inspections in June because no sink had been installed, but passed a July 6 inspection.
Response: An owner didnât return a message seeking comment.Â
- Murphy Woodhouse Arizona Daily Star
In June:
History: This was the restaurantâs first routine inspection.
What the inspector saw: Eight critical violations, including foods kept at unsafe temps, an employee slicing lemons with bare hands, improper food storage, seashells being used to serve meat products, inconsistent date marking, and raw sushi fish served without a consumer advisory posted.
Follow-up: The restaurant passed a July 1 reinspection.
Response: Jenny Lu, a Joy Buffet manager, said the violations have been corrected and that the inspector âsat down with me personally, and he taught me how to do everything.âÂ
- Murphy Woodhouse Arizona Daily Star
In June:
History: Since 2014, the meat market has had three good ratings. This was its first failed inspection.
What the inspector saw: Six critical violations on June 22, including unsafe food temperatures, raw oysters stored above canned drinks, beans stored next to raw meat, an employeeâs personal drink being stored in an ice machine, improper labeling of shellfish and unsafe storage of cleaning products. Many of the violations were dealt with on-site.
Follow-up: Passed a July 6 reinspection.
Response: Owner Claudia Gonzalez said none of the violations put customers at risk and that they have all been resolved.Â
- Murphy Woodhouse Arizona Daily Star
In June:
History: Has received mostly good ratings since 2013, but has failed one other time and received one âneeds improvementâ rating.
What the inspector saw: Six critical violations on June 23, earning the restaurant a probationary rating. Violations included poor hand-washing practices, raw food being stored near ready-to-eat food, fried chicken being stored in a used cardboard box, seasoning and sauce containers covered in encrusted food, food without proper date labeling, and an unlabeled pink liquid.
Follow-up: A reinspection was not done within 10 days of the failed inspection, as is customary, because the restaurant is closed until July 14. A reinspection will be done after it reopens, according to a health department official.
Response: The restaurant was closed the week the Star tried to reach owners or managers for comment.Â
- Murphy Woodhouse Arizona Daily Star
In June:
History: Since 2008, this location has received exclusively good and excellent ratings.
What the inspector saw: This failed inspection stems from a March inspection in which an inspector saw there was no hand-washing station for a recently installed growler-filling station, resulting in a âneeds improvementâ rating. On June 23, a hand-washing station had still not been installed. The store is considering removing the growler-filling station, but if it is to remain, the store will need to submit plans to install a hand-washing sink.
Follow-up: There are no records of another follow-up.
Response: A company representative did not respond to requests for comment.
- By Murphy Woodhouse Arizona Daily Star
In June:
Too-cool chicken and not-cool-enough pizza ingredients helped earn Claim Jumperâs Tucson restaurant a âprobationaryâ rating from the county health department.
On Tuesday, June 7, a county inspector found chicken cooked to under the mandated 165 degrees and a number of pizza ingredients kept at well over the 41 degrees required for potentially hazardous foods. The inspector also saw an employee handle a garbage can and then return to work without washing his hands; food prep utensils with âdry food debris;â and cutting boards being cleaned but not sanitized as required.
Most of the violations were corrected on site with the inspector present, according to a county report.
Probationary status is given when five or more critical violations are found at a restaurant. If critical violations are still present at a follow-up inspection within 10 days, the restaurant âfails.â
Since 2005, Claim Jumper, at 3761 E. Broadway, consistently received âgoodâ and âexcellentâ ratings, and this inspection was the first it failed.
Claim Jumper Senior Vice President Terry Turney said, âUnfortunately, on the day of the inspection, our staff did not adhere to our high standards, which is totally unacceptable. All violations were corrected on-site during the inspection. We will continue to work closely with the Health Department to ensure that the highest measures of sanitation and safety are maintained for our guests.â
- By Murphy Woodhouse Arizona Daily Star
Inadequate cooling of potentially hazardous foods got the Tanque Verde Swap Meetâs Mercado briefly shut down on June 10.
A county health inspector found that the two walk-in coolers on-site âare not capable of holding food at 41 degrees or less.â
Instead, hot dogs, cheese and beans and other food were found to be 50 degrees or warmer. Additionally, the temperature alarm had been sounding for several hours the day of the visit, indicating unsafe temperatures, and âfood service continuedâ nevertheless, according to the inspection report.
The inspector found an additional five critical violations, which earned the cafeteria a âprobationaryâ rating.
County staff visited the facility the next day and determined that the coolers were functioning properly, and keeping food below required temperatures.
âFacility is OK to do full menu service at this time,â the June 11 follow-up report reads, though it goes on to advise managers to âcontinue to monitor refrigeration, especially since monsoons are here.â
Beyond the cooler violations, the inspector observed an employee handling food with her bare hands, raw meat being stored above ready-to-eat food and a nonfunctioning dish sanitizer, all of which were corrected that day.
A statement provided by the swap meetâs operators says that they have âoperated 10 different concessions and drink stands for over 40 years and this is the only incident that has ever closed a stand. It was immediately rectified and the Health Department cleared us to open the next day.â
Additionally, the âemployee in questionâ for some of the violations will take a county-administered food management course.
âWe are confident this will not recur,â it goes on to say.
This is the restaurantâs first failed inspection, and it has received ratings of âgoodâ and âexcellentâ exclusively since 2000.
Normally follow-up inspections at failed facilities are conducted within 10 days of the inspection. However, because the Mercado is only open on the weekends, the visit is scheduled for Friday, June 24, a county spokeswoman said.
- By Murphy Woodhouse Arizona Daily Star
Inadequate hand-washing practices and unsanitary meat handling, among other violations, earned local chain BK Tacosâ North First Avenue location a âprobationaryâ rating from the county health department Wednesday.
The county inspector found eight critical violations, most of which were resolved or addressed on-site.
The inspector found meats kept below established temperatures for hot food, observed a BK employee handle a garbage can with gloves and then clean them off with dishwashing sprayer before returning to work, the same employee washing hands without soap, and cooked ribs ready for eating being placed on a cutting board covered with raw meat juices.
Additionally, the dish sanitizer tested negative for sanitizer three times, some food was stored without dates, and several bottles of cleaning supplies were stored without proper labeling.
Daphne Diaz, a BK shift supervisor, said the problems, which she described as âminor,â are âalready fixed.â She added that a re-inspection is scheduled for Monday, and that all of the restaurantâs staff have been registered for the next available food safety class in July âso that this doesnât happen anymore.â
The BK location, at 2680 N. First Ave., has received mostly âgoodâ and âexcellentâ ratings since 2006, though it has received two âneeds improvementâ ratings. The most recent inspection was its first âprobationaryâ rating, which was until recently known as a âprovisionalâ rating.
- Murphy Woodhouse Arizona Daily Star
4,600:Â Food service licenses in Pima County
708:Â Excellent, good or passed inspections in June
25:Â Needs improvement inspections in June
9:Â Provisional and failed inspections in June
Source: Pima County Health Department
View this profile on Instagram#ThisIsTucson đĩ (@this_is_tucson) âĸ Instagram photos and videos
Most viewed stories
-
Nearly 50 fun events happening in the month of January! â¨
-
New eats! 10 new restaurants that opened in Tucson this fall
-
What a delicious year: the best meals I ate in Tucson in 2025 đ
-
Tucson's twin winter music festivals kick off this weekend đĩ
-
Horchata lattes and breakfast burritos: Tucson's Barista del Barrio opens 2nd location
-
Free and fun events to check out this January!
-
Looking ahead to Tucson's new and cool for '26
-
Glitter and boas: Dress up '70s style for ABBA tribute show at the Rialto đĒŠâ¨
-
Create the icy dessert of your dreams at this new frozen yogurt spot đ¨
-
27 exciting events to check out this weekend, January 16-18 đ