PHOENIX â Arizonaâs wobbly budget picture just got a lot bleaker as the impact of recent moves by the Trump Administration throws a monkey wrench into the state and national economies.
The Legislatureâs independent budget analysts and a panel of public and private economists who join with them to project state revenue agreed Thursday to factor in a big drop in tax collections and other state revenue for the coming budget year.
Staff with the non-partisan Joint Legislative Budget Committee and the economists who sit on the Legislatureâs Finance Advisory Committee lowered the expected state revenue growth for next year from $612 million to $277 million. That leaves just a relatively tiny surplus â less than 2% â in the expected $17.6 billion budget for the coming year.
That means the Legislature and Gov. Katie Hobbs will have a lot fewer options as they negotiate a budget for the fiscal year that starts July 1.
And thatâs if a recession doesnât hit.
Recession worries rise
The chances of at least a mild recession have soared in recent weeks, according to experts at banks, investment houses and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. For example, this month, J.P. Morgan Research raised the probability of a recession hitting this year from 40% to 60%.
If one emerges, state spending on health care for the poor alone could go up enough to erase the stateâs $1.6 billion rainy day fund in just two years, according to a âstress testââ scenario presented to the panel on Thursday by the JLBC, as the legislative analysts are known.
The groupâs predicted dip in state revenue growth is based on what JLBC Director Richard Stavneak described as huge economic uncertainties caused by the federal governmentâs move to sharply boost tariffs, which will raise prices for businesses and consumers, and cuts to federal spending that is spent in Arizona. Expected federal tax cuts often matched by Arizona could help stimulate the economy eventually but at least in the short-term, cut revenue.
The combined action and the resulting unease about the economyâs direction will likely cause businesses and consumers to trim spending, with lagging economic activity leading to a dip in state tax revenue, Stavneak warned.
âIf you are a business or youâre an individual, when there is economic uncertainty the tendency is to sort of pull back, not spend as much, not invest as much, until you get greater clarity on what is happening,ââ Stavneak told the panel. âWhich I think would be a wise position for state government to also have.ââ
Lower expectations for revenue growth
That position led the panel to lower its expectation for the stateâs revenue growth, which is in effect new cash to spend, in half.
Stavneak and the other panelists never named Trump, just pointing to federal actions.
The Republican-controlled Legislature and Democratic governor donât have to use the JLBC numbers. But theyâre generally viewed as the best guess for the upcoming budget year and are usually adopted.
The new figures come as the June 30 end of the current budget year looms and as Hobbs and GOP lawmakers are locked in a fight over how to fill a $120 million shortfall in a state program serving disabled Arizonans that will run out of money in just weeks.
Both had planned to spend most of the $600 million in new money for pet priorities â Hobbs on raises for state troopers and corrections officers, housing and new child care assistance. Republicans havenât released their spending plan, but have been pushing for tax cuts on top of huge income tax reductions enacted under former Gov. Doug Ducey.
UA budget forecast ditched
The panel that met Thursday usually uses four âsectorsââ to come up with an overall prediction of the stateâs revenue â the JLBCâs staff, the FAC panelistsâ combined opinion, and âbaseââ and âcautiousââ forecasts by economists at the University of Arizona.
This week, they decided to ditch the UA forecasts and rely just on the predictions of the FAC panel and legislative budget staff. Thatâs because the UofA model uses quarterly data, which has been made inaccurate because of Trumpâs moves.
The University of Arizonaâs George Hammond, who runs the universityâs Economic and Business Research Center, agreed that his groupâs predictions on revenue, which were generally in line with Januaryâs, are out of date because of recent federal actions.
âIf it were updated, the UA forecast would be significantly lower than we have operated under,ââ Hammond said.
He noted that the stateâs job growth slowed significantly last year despite slowing inflation, a sign that a dip was already primed.
âRisks to economic growth are significantly elevated,ââ Hammond said in his presentation to the FAC. Like Stavneak, he ticked off tariffs and federal spending cuts as causes, but added one more: mass deportations.
âMass deportations, weâll see how that plays out,ââ he said.
âBut our labor market is pretty tight with an unemployment rate of 4%,ââ he said. âYou start deporting large shares of our labor force (and) that will be a significant problem for labor supply â weâll experience shortages and other issues.ââ
Hammond also noted that job growth in Arizona had flattened out, something backed up by Doug Walls with the state Department of Economic Opportunity, which measures employment in the state.
Walls said the state has been seeing job losses and lower hiring since last year, with the unemployment rate going from 3.3% in March 2024 to 4.1% last month.
âA lot of the economic indicators out there are pointing toward slower growth, and backing up what weâre seeing in the job market,ââ Walls said.
Recession talk âoverblownâ
Talk of recession is overblown, said Alan Maguire, an FAC panelist who runs his own economic and policy consulting firm and is a former investment banker and chief deputy state Treasurer.
While Maguire noted that housing and stocks are overpriced and he sees slower growth, âthat is not a recession.ââ
And he pointed to AI chip company Nvidia, which just put in an order for $500 billion in new chips, many to be made at Taiwan Semiconductorâs new plant in Phoenix.
âSo we have a built-in driver and those are AI chips which are really hot,ââ Maguire said. âI frankly donât listen to the panicking.ââ
That said, Maguire said thereâs a lot more downside risk to the economy, and âuncertainty is very high.ââ
âThere is definitely a lot going on and itâs a time to be cautious,ââ he said.
Randie Stein with the investment banking firm Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Inc., said she agrees that thereâs little hope for increased state revenue.
âNothing is telling me that weâre going to have substantial gains in the general fund over the next 15 months,ââ Stein said. âItâs much more likely that we will be, hopefully, stable. But I think the possibility of actual declines is also possible.ââ
Thatâs in large part due to worry from business and individual consumers, said Daniel Court, chief economist with Elliott D Pollack and Co.
âWhen thereâs uncertainty, consumers pull back,ââ he said.
âHow does a business make an investment in the current environment when you donât know if a policy will stay in place or get worse or get better?ââ Court said. âI think right now itâs maximum uncertainty.
Budget picture to stay âchoppyâ
He said âstress testingââ to see potential impacts on the state budget is smart, but âit could all go away with a couple of tweetsââ from Trump.
Stavneak said thereâs already signs that revenue is cratering.
State tax collections were running $60 million above what was expected in the FAC report issued in early January. But he said collections last month were way down, erasing $45 million of that gain and leaving the state just $15 million above forecast.
The coming months are likely to be choppy, with potential big gains in sales tax revenue as people and businesses stock up before the effect of new tariffâs boost prices. Corporate and personal income taxes could also go up as 2024 returns are processed.
Neither will give a real picture of the stateâs economy â that will take months.
All that will play into budget talks between the GOP-controlled the Legislature and Gov Katie Hobbs.
In an interview before the FAC meeting, Sen. John Kavanagh, R-Fountain Hills, said he expected a downward revision from the FAC. The chair of the Senateâs appropriations committee said âa lot of the bets are offââ if that happens.
âNot just because of their announced reduction,ââ Kavanagh said. âBut because it could show a trend that would be very troubling and make us much more conservative fiscally than we otherwise would be.ââ



