David Mastio
As the Democrat-imposed government shutdown sputters to a close, the Federal Aviation Administration says airline traffic will take weeks to get back to normal. That will add to the millions of travelers who have already had their flights delayed, disrupted and even derailed.
It doesn’t have to be this way.
Even the socialists in Canada have figured out that a private nonprofit can reliably control air traffic better than a government bureaucracy. And with the prospect of another government shutdown just months away, our current system is a glaring vulnerability – a tether to the whims of Washington when the private sector could do it better without all the drama.
Privatizing air traffic control, as Canada and dozens of other nations have successfully done, offers a reasonable path forward. It’s time to remove this essential function from the political crossfire – which has allowed funding to lapse 14 times since 1980 – and entrust it to a nonprofit, user-funded corporation.
Privatization would fund air traffic control through fees on airlines and private aircraft — fees already collected but now funneled through volatile appropriations. No more shutdowns. No more chaos. Moreover, a nonprofit corporation would have the freedom to expand training of the air traffic controllers in short supply under a government system that has restricted access to education in parochial political battles in Congress.
Critics on the left fear privatization means corporate greed will compromise safety. They point to for-profit models and conjure images of cost-cutting at the expense of lives.
But the proposal isn’t a Wall Street takeover. It’s a nonprofit corporation, modeled after Canada’s Nav Canada. Established in 1996, Nav Canada is governed by a board representing airlines, general aviation, unions and the government. It’s self-funded via service charges, not taxpayer dollars, and has invested billions in modern technology.
Safety? Transport Canada’s oversight ensures standards are similar to FAA benchmarks, with accident rates on par with the U.S. since privatization. The FAA would retain ultimate safety certification and oversight, much as it does with aircraft manufacturers like Boeing. And unions are banned from striking.
Nonprofit air traffic control could eliminate the troubling technological incompetence that plagues the FAA’s $25 billion annual budget, much of which funds systems from the 1970s. The NextGen modernization program, planned since 2003, remains mired in delays and cost overruns. It was originally set to be implemented this year, but internal FAA reports show much of it won’t be in place til the 2030s – if then. The FAA’s excuses for this delay are comical.
Nav Canada, by contrast, upgraded its radar and satellite systems on time. Some argue we should just take their technology and move it here.
This idea lets Democrats secure ironclad safety regulations and union protections that are already working globally. Republicans gain fiscal discipline and a smaller government.
Before the shutdown, President Donald Trump’s transportation secretary said this was a no-go for them.
“To have a fight about privatization is just going to divide people,” Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said earlier this year. “And what that’ll actually do is make sure that we don’t actually build a brand new air traffic control system.”
I wouldn’t bet on the Trump administration suddenly being more competent at big government solutions than the previous failed bipartisan wonkery.
Nothing could be more popular than getting Trump and Democratic Senate leader Chuck Schumer out of the cockpit. Germany, the United Kingdom and Australia have all already kicked their prime ministers to the curb. We should do the same with our politicians. Several pieces of legislation in Congress would get this done, and public outrage at the shutdown could be the catalyst.
This could become the template for reining in more chaos in Washington. Every time the political duopoly screws up, we take away one of their toys.
