The Op-Ed on science vs. religion on Christmas Day exposed the root of polarization, namely, the prevalence of misunderstanding and hence disrespect for others. Mr. Gavlak mistook scientism for science and biblical literalism for religion. I believe (an act of faith) in broadening one’s mind by learning relevant facts, often found by other’s diligent investigations, to reach one’s own understanding that would bring harmony and peace to oneself and others. The following questions would be a start and perhaps a skeleton syllabus for a high-school course in the humanities, taught next to the physics lab.

Why every culture has religion?

What are the religions in the world?

Do they have commonalities?

What has β€œdivine Providence” to do with American independence?

What sustained the survival of the American slaves and led to the Civil Rights Movement?

Why do all the leading universities offer religious studies?

Allow me to quote Albert Einstein, β€œScience without religion is lame and religion without science is blind.” Happy New Year!

Ke Chiang Hsieh

Midtown

Disclaimer: As submitted to the Arizona Daily Star.

Follow these steps to easily submit a letter to the editor or guest opinion to the Arizona Daily Star.


Become a #ThisIsTucson member! Your contribution helps our team bring you stories that keep you connected to the community. Become a member today.