WASHINGTONΒ  β€” A sharply divided Supreme Court rejectedΒ President-elect Donald Trump’sΒ final bid ThursdayΒ to pause hisΒ New York hush-money case, clearing the way for him to be sentenced for felony crimes days before he returns to the presidency.

The court’s 5-4 order clears the way for Judge Juan M. Merchan to impose a sentence Friday on Trump, who was convicted in what prosecutors called an attempt to cover up a $130,000 hush money payment toΒ porn actor Stormy Daniels.

President-elect Donald Trump talks to reporters after a meeting with Republican leadership at the Capitol on Wednesday, Jan. 8, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)

Daniels says she had a sexual encounter with Trump in 2006. Trump denies he had a liaison with Daniels or other wrongdoing.

Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Amy Coney Barrett joined with the court’s three liberals in rejecting his emergency motion.

The majority found his sentencing wouldn't be an insurmountable burden during the presidential transition since Merchan has indicated he won't give Trump jail time, fines or probation.

Trump's attorneys asked the sentencing to be delayed as he appeals the verdict, but the majority of justices found his arguments can be handled as part of the regular appeals process.

Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh would have delayed the sentencing, the order states.

Trump said he respects the court's order and plans to push his appeal of a verdict. β€œI respect the court’s opinion β€” I think it was actually a very good opinion for us because you saw what they said, but they invited the appeal and the appeal is on the bigger issue. So, we’ll see how it works out,” he said.

FILE - The Supreme Court is seen at sundown in Washington, Nov. 6, 2020. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File)

The conservative-majority court handed Trump other major victories over the past year, ensuring that states could not kick him off the ballot because of the 2021 attack on the Capitol and giving him immunity from prosecution over some acts he took as president in a ruling that delayed an election-interference case against him.

The justices could also be faced with weighing other parts of the sweeping conservative changes he's promised after he takes office.

In the New York case, Trump’s attorneys have argued that evidence used in the Manhattan trial violated last summer’s Supreme Court ruling giving TrumpΒ broad immunity from prosecutionΒ over acts he took as president.

At the least, they have said, the sentencing should be delayed while their appeals play out to avoid distracting Trump during the White House transition.

Prosecutors pushed back, saying there’s no reason for the court to take the β€œextraordinary step” of intervening in a state case now. Trump’s attorneys haven’t showed that an hourlong virtual hearing would be a serious disruption, and a pause would likely mean pushing the case pastΒ the Jan. 20 inauguration, creating a yearslong delay in sentencing if it happens at all.

Trump’s attorneys went to the justices afterΒ New York courtsΒ refused to postpone sentencing, including the state’s highest court Thursday.

Judges in New York found that the convictions onΒ 34 felony counts of falsifying business recordsΒ related to personal matters rather than Trump’s official acts as president.Β 

Trump’s attorneys called the case politically motivated, and they said sentencing him now would be a β€œgrave injustice” that threatens to disrupt the presidential transition as the Republican prepares to return to the White House.

Trump is represented by D. John Sauer, his pick to be the solicitor general, who represents the government before the high court.

Sauer also argued for Trump in the separate criminal case charging him with trying toΒ overturn the resultsΒ of the 2020 election, which resulted in the Supreme Court’s immunity opinion.

Defense attorneys cited that opinion in arguing some of the evidence used against him in the hush money trial should have been shielded by presidential immunity. That includes testimony from some White House aides and social media posts made while he was in office.

The decision came a day after Justice Alito confirmed that heΒ took a phone callΒ from Trump the day before the president-elect’s lawyers filed their emergency motion before the high court. The justice said the call was about a clerk, not any upcoming or current cases, but the unusual communication prompted calls for Alito to recuse himself, including from the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee.

Sisak reported from New York, Hill from Albany, New York. Associated Press writer Mark Sherman contributed to this report.


Become a #ThisIsTucson member! Your contribution helps our team bring you stories that keep you connected to the community. Become a member today.