PHOENIX โ A proposal by Gov. Doug Ducey to abolish so-called legislative immunity is getting negative reaction from some lawmakers who enjoy its protections โ and would have to vote to put it on the ballot for voters to repeal.
โIt was put here for a reason, by the people, in the Constitution,โ said House Speaker Rusty Bowers.
House Minority Leader Charlene Fernandez said there are legitimate reasons that lawmakers need protections from being arrested in certain circumstances.
Rep. Vince Leach, R-Tucson, said the few lawmakers who have abused the immunity have paid the price.
And Sen. Lela Alston, D-Phoenix, who has been at the Capitol longer than anyone else, said Duceyโs call to repeal the provision reflects a misunderstanding of exactly what it says โ a misunderstanding she said is apparently shared by some legislators who have tried to claim it.
โThey think they have carte blanche to do whatever they wanted, whenever they wanted,โ Alston said.
That occurred last year when Rep. Paul Mosley, R-Lake Havasu City, claimed legislative immunity when he was stopped for speeding. Thereโs even video of Mosley claiming he has driven as fast as 140 mph because his legislative immunity allows him to do that.
Not true, said Alston, who was first elected to the Legislature in 1976.
What it actually says is that lawmakers cannot be arrested during the legislative session or in the 15 days leading up to the session unless they are charged with treason, a felony or โbreach of the peace.โ Nothing immunizes them from being arrested and prosecuted after the session is over.
The same provision also says lawmakers are not subject to โcivil processโ during the same period.
Ducey, in his State of the State speech Monday, referred to the provision as โlegislative immunity.โ
He said one reason people hold members of Congress in contempt is that they exempt themselves from many of the laws they pass.
โLetโs show the people of Arizona that their elected leaders will live under the same laws as every man and woman in this state,โ the governor said.
Bowers, however, said he sees no reason to repeal the protection simply because some lawmakers have acted badly and then sought to escape being held accountable.
Leach said the whole idea of the protection is to keep a police officer or sheriffโs deputy from detaining one or two lawmakers whose votes are needed.
โYou could render it nonfunctional,โ he said of the Legislature if a member were kept away.
Anyway, he said, those who have abused the immunity have paid the price in bad publicity โ and more.
โOne member didnโt return,โ he said, referring to Mosley, who lost his re-election bid last year.
Fernandez agreed that the purpose of the provision is to ensure that lawmakers can get to the Capitol without being delayed.
โIt wasnโt for me to get out of running a stop sign,โ she said. And Fernandez said the fact that a few people have sought to misuse it is insufficient reason to eliminate the protection entirely.
Some lawmakers, however, side with Ducey.
โWeโre no better than any of our constituents,โ said Senate President Karen Fann.
