PHOENIX β Republican lawmakers are moving to let voters throughout the state override the ability of local voters to set minimum wages for cities.
Legislation awaiting House action this week would ask voters in November to declare that the regulation of employee benefits, including wages, βis of statewide concern.ββ It also says that not just wages but also other compensation, paid leaves, meal breaks and rest periods are βnot subject to further regulation by a city, town or other political subdivision of this state.ββ
That language, if approved by voters, would be put into the Arizona Constitution.
The proposal would override a 2016 state law, approved by voters by a 58% to 42% margin, that not only creates a state minimum wage higher than the federal figure, but specifically gives cities and towns the right to do more.
A constitutional amendment trumps statutory changes, and the Arizona Constitution can be amended only by voters.
If approved, the measure, House Concurrent Resolution 2031, would most immediately supersede minimum wages already enacted by voters in Tucson and Flagstaff that are higher than the current $12.80 in state law. It would also preclude voters in other communities from following suit and making their own decisions.
This isnβt the only effort to restrict what cities, towns and counties can mandate of local employers.
On Monday, the House Appropriations Committee approved House Bill 2001. It would bar local governments from requiring companies to βalter, adjust or in any way regulate an employeeβs labor productivity during working hours.ββ
Nicole LaSlavic, lobbyist for the Arizona Lodging and Tourism Association, said this is in reaction to a 2020 bid by Phoenix officials, never enacted, to put into law what private employers can demand of their workers.
Both measures need full House approval.
Whatβs behind both are efforts by Republican lawmakers to restrain the activities of local governments β and, most immediately, communities where Democrats outnumber Republicans. They are drawing predictable reactions from three Democratic mayors.
Tucson Mayor Regina Romero pointed out that Proposition 206, the 2016 law setting a state minimum wage, specifically permits higher local options. Based on that, Tucson voters in 2021 approved going to $13 this April and, in steps, up to $15 in 2025.
The Legislature should βstop wasting their time trying to override the will of Tucson voters,ββ said Romero.
Flagstaff Mayor Paul Deasy accused lawmakers of βdisrespectββ for the voters of his community.
He pointed out that residents there approved their own minimum wage the same year voters enacted Proposition 206. Flagstaffβs is now $15.50, with future increases tied to inflation.
βThis was not decided by the Flagstaff City Council but by the people of Flagstaff,ββ Deasy said. The action by state lawmakers βshows a complete slap in the face to the people,β he said.
And an aide to Phoenix Mayor Kate Gallego, Jeanine LβEcuyer, called Arizona βone of the worst states for infringing on local control.ββ
But Rep. Jeff Weninger, R-Chandler, said he sees nothing wrong in allowing voters from other communities that donβt have their own local ordinances on wages and other labor issues to override what voters have done elsewhere.
Weninger, who is a part-owner of sandwich shops, said Arizona cannot attract businesses if it does not have uniform laws statewide. For him, the issues go beyond simply what employers have to pay their workers.
Consider, he said, the idea of βpredictive schedulingββ that requires some employers to have a workersβ schedule out sometimes two or three weeks ahead of time. While not enacted by any Arizona community, it has taken hold in places like California.
Tucson has a variant of that. Its ordinance requires large employers β those with an average of 26 workers β to pay a minimum of three hoursβ worth of wages when a shift is cut short or canceled with fewer than 24 hours notice to the employee.
Rep. Regina Cobb, R-Kingman, the sponsor of this yearβs proposed constitutional amendment, said statewide intervention is necessary.
βThe ability of the cities and counties to adopt geographical specific labor regulations has created an administrative nightmare for small business owners,ββ she said. βBusinesses are put at a competitive disadvantage based entirely on what side of the street they are working on.ββ
Cobb said she worries it wonβt stop with Tucson and Flagstaff.
βItβll end up in dozens of separate labor standards,ββ she said. Cobb, who operates a dental practice in Kingman, said she would not want to have separate rules for her workers if she were to open an office in Flagstaff.
Rep. Sarah Liguori, D-Phoenix, said she isnβt sure a single statewide standard is a good idea.
βIβm not sure if this is going to help or hurt wages,ββ she said. βEach city and town does business differently. So the state coming in and overseeing how everyone needs to do business is my concern.ββ
Cobb also is the author behind HB 2001.
While it cannot affect local minimum wages β that requires the constitutional amendment she is pushing β it would override local control on other labor issues, all without having to seek statewide voter approval. And it could be enacted solely by the Republican-controlled Legislature without having to ask voters what they think.
LaSlavic, the lodging and tourism lobbyist, said members of her organization were alarmed by that unsuccessful 2020 bid by Phoenix to impose new rules on private employers.
One, for example, would have given furloughed employees a first βright of recallββ for any position for which they are qualified. There also were issues of sick leave for workers not covered by federal laws enacted during the pandemic.
It was so specific, she said, that it would bar companies from disciplining workers who failed to clean at least 4,000 square feet of space in any eight-hour shift.