PHOENIX β A state lawmaker wants to make criminals out of some people who take videos of cops questioning or arresting someone.
The proposal by Sen. John Kavanagh, R-Fountain Hills, would bar shooting video within 20 feet of any βlaw enforcement activityβ unless the officer first gave permission. A first offense would carry a $300 fine, with subsequent violations potentially sending someone to jail for up to six months.
Daniel Pochoda with the American Civil Liberties Union, says SB 1054 is a violation of First Amendment rights. And attorney Daniel Barr, who handles media issues, questioned the need for such a restriction.
But Kavanagh, a retired police officer, insisted heβs not trying to cloak law enforcement activity from public view.
He said people are free to stand 21 feet away. And he rejected contentions that someone standing that far back might not be able to record important details, like whether someone was reaching for a gun or a cellphone.
βMost cameras have great resolution where you donβt really lose anything when youβre 20 feet away,β Kavanagh argued. βAt 20 feet you can pretty much pick up small objects.β
Whatβs behind the measure, he said, is the safety of police officers who may be doing anything from questioning a suspicious person to making an arrest.
βHaving one or more persons suddenly walking up behind and around them with cameras is a distraction,β Kavanagh said.
βThe officer doesnβt know if this is somebody whoβs a friend of the individual heβs doing law enforcement action against or what,β he continued. βBut it distracts the officer which creates a safety problem for the officer.β
βSo weβre going to make it a crime?β Barr responded.
βIf youβre actually interfering with them in some way, interfering with his movement or something like that, I can see that you can be sanctioned for that,β he continued, saying there already are laws on the books to cover that situation. βWhether youβre filming him or not has nothing to do with it.β
Kavanagh disagreed, insisting those trying to get videos are a special problem. βThey arenβt just standing or walking by,β he said.
βWith video, you stand near and you point and you change your perspective to get a better shot,β Kavanagh continued. βItβs a much more intimate interaction than an ordinary citizen watching the cops do something.β
Pochoda said the whole question of what might distract a police officer ignores the underlying issue.
βThere is a clearly established First Amendment right for citizens β or anyone, you donβt have to be a citizen β to record public activities of law enforcement,β he said. βYou donβt have to be a professional journalist to possess this First Amendment right.β
He acknowledged that courts have allowed infringements on that right, but only if there is a βdemonstrable need.β
βYou canβt just have this automatic arbitrary number,β Pochoda said, referring to that 20-foot video-free zone. He said those who interfere with police can always be detained.
Barr said thereβs another particular flaw in the proposal.
As written, it would make a criminal out of those who take out a cellphone to videotape their own questioning by police as, by definition, they would be within 20 feet of whatβs happening.
Kavanagh, however, doesnβt see that as a problem, saying thereβs no inherent right to videotape your own interaction, particularly if thatβs an arrest.