PHOENIX β Secretary of State Katie Hobbs is urging a federal judge to throw out a challenge to a law that could make it more difficult for groups to put initiatives on the ballot.
In new legal filings, attorneys for Hobbs are defending a 2014 law that says if petition circulators do not show up in court then all the signatures they gathered will not be counted, regardless of whether it turns out they actually were valid. Hobbs said the law serves a legitimate state purpose and does not unduly burden the right to circulate petitions or to vote.
Hobbs also brushed aside arguments the law violates the First Amendment by making it less likely than initiatives will qualify for the ballot.
βThe First Amendment does not mandate that ballot access be easy,β wrote Assistant Attorney General Joseph La Rue who is defending Hobbs and her office.
βThere is no first Amendment right to place an initiative on the ballot,β he argued in the new legal papers to U.S. District Court Judge Susan Bolton. βThe fact that a regulation makes it less likely that initiatives will be enacted is therefore not constitutionally determinative.β
The 2014 law, which passed without significant debate β and which Hobbs voted for as a state senator β spells out that paid circulators and those who do not live in Arizona must first register with the secretary of state or their signatures collected do not count.
More significant, it allows those trying to keep a measure off the ballot to subpoena those circulators. And if any circulator who has to register does not show up, then all the signatures that person gathered can be struck, potentially leaving the petition drive short of its goal.
Attorney Sarah Gonski represents several individuals and groups that have been involved in prior ballot measures. One of the plaintiffs is Jessica Miracle, a paid petition circulator on the 2018 proposal to impose new renewable energy mandates on utilities.
Subpoenaed by foes of the measure, the lawsuit says Miracle could not attend because her children were sick, she did not have her own transportation to Phoenix, and no one would tell her clearly how many days she would need to be in Phoenix. The result, according to Gonski, was that all of the 2,604 signatures Miracle gathered were invalidated.
The measure still made the ballot but was defeated.
Hobbs, in the new legal filings through her attorneys, said the 2014 law is an extension of existing laws designed to protect the integrity of the initiative process.
For example, La Rue wrote, one requires a circulator to personally witness each signature.
βThis requirement discourages those signing petitions from forging other electorsβ signatures on petition sheets,β the legal papers state.
Similarly, he cited the provision that says circulators must be qualified to register to vote in Arizona, meaning they cannot be felons unless their civil rights were restored.
βThis helps ensure circulators have not been convicted of crimes that might call into question their trustworthiness,β La Rue wrote.
All of that, he said, goes to the nature of the 2014 law that requires Hobbs to remove signatures collected by circulators who have not complied with subpoenas.
βThis assists the secretary in fulfilling her statutory duty to uphold the integrity of the initiative process for everyone by only certifying for the ballot those initiatives that have fully complied with applicable legal requirements and gathered sufficient signatures,β La Rue argued.
A spokeswoman for Hobbs said the secretary βhas an obligation to enforce and defend duly enacted state law in good faithβ but declined to comment on the specifics of the law or the lawsuit.
No date has been set for a hearing on the lawsuit.
