Panel OKs bill allowing lawmakers to change voter initiatives

PHOENIX — A Senate panel voted Tuesday to ask voters to give up some of their rights to enact — and, more to the point, preserve — their own laws.

HCR 2043 would effectively overturn a 1998 voter-approved constitutional provision that says once a measure is approved at the ballot it can be overturned only with a three-fourths vote of both the House and Senate. And even with that margin, lawmakers cannot repeal what voters have enacted but can approve only changes that “further the purpose” of the underlying measure.

Rep. J.D. Mesnard, R-Chandler, said lawmakers need the ability to react when situations change.

“Pretty much everything passed at the ballot is locked in stone,” he told members of the Senate Committee on Federalism, Mandates and Fiscal Responsibility

Mesnard said his proposal, if approved in November, would not provide a carte blanche for a majority of lawmakers to undo voter proposals on a “willy-nilly” basis.

It says lawmakers could enact changes only if they get the same margin as the original measure. So if the initiative got 55 percent of the popular vote, it would take 33 of 60 House members to override and 17 of 30 senators.

Central to the debate is that 1998 constitutional change.

It actually has its roots in a successful 1996 initiative, the first attempt to allow doctors to prescribe marijuana and otherwise illegal drugs to their patients. The following year, though, lawmakers concluded that voters might have been confused and effectively repealed what voters had just enacted.

Backers came back in 1998, not only getting voters to re-enact the 1996 measure but also approve the Voter Protection Act, which ties the hands of lawmakers in tinkering with what is enacted at the ballot.

Back to homepage

Subscriber Login

Keep reading with a digital access subscription.

Subscribe now

HCR 2043 would not affect anything approved to this point.

But if ratified in November, it would give the go-ahead for legislators to alter whatever is enacted at this election and every one in the future.

Mesnard said that flexibility is needed.

“People want us to be effective,” he said. “Our ability to be effective is becoming diminished because of the tentacles of Voter Protection that are spreading throughout our ability to modify things very difficult.”

Sen. Steve Smith, R-Maricopa, said no one was trying to eliminate the initiative process which dates from the first days of statehood. But he said there is a “shared balance” of power.

“We are a republic before we are a democracy,” he said.

“And if you do have a republican form of government, as our nation and state has, then certainly I think that form of government should always prevail.”

The measure, which already has been approved by the House, now needs action by the full Senate.