The following is the opinion and analysis of the writer:
It is becoming obvious β and troubling β that the city of Tucson, rather than taking a proactive leadership position in Pima County, has chosen instead an adversarial and confrontational path when dealing with its regional partners. We are witnessing this on several fronts.
The tenor of communication leveled by Tucsonβs mayor at the Pima Association of Governments has devolved into acrimonious, gauntlet-dropping demands. This same type of βline-in-the-sandβ dialogue from Tucsonβs elected leaders is being directed at the Regional Transportation Authority.
Further, City Council members are attempting to pull the rug out from under Pima Countyβs historic PAYGO road repair plan by utilizing outrage and melodrama.
And perhaps the most insidious campaign of all is the cityβs efforts to inflict βdifferential water ratesβ upon Tucson Water customers living outside any city limits. If enacted, water rates for those customers could rise by up to 50%.
It seems Tucsonβs only argument in its attempts to justify its conflict-provoking efforts and positions is centered on βfairness.β In other words, Tucson is giving, paying and sacrificing more in regional matters and costs and receiving less than any other jurisdiction in Pima County.
This is clearly not the case and is a topic worthy of another column to address the cityβs perceived grievances.
Letβs focus on differential water rates. The city is instituting a three-pronged attack in this arena: annexation, social justice and thwarting development and growth. The cityβs annexation ambitions can be achieved with messaging to those water customers who complain about their increased rates to simply allow themselves to be annexed, preferably and presumably, by the city of Tucson.
Social justice (cloaked as water equity) can be realized by using the surplus monies created by increasing the water rates of the βhigh-income familiesβ living in Pima County to subsidize the water bills of the lower-income city residents.
And growth and development can be stopped by making water rates for developers so high that housing and business construction projects will not be economically viable.
You donβt believe this could be happening?
Just read the βOur Tucson Waterβ manifestos on Facebook. Review the April 5, Arizona Daily Star opinion column authored by Ed Hendel, a dissenting member of the Cityβs Water Advisory Commission. Then listen to the statements made during the April 6 Board of Supervisors meeting by two of my colleagues.
This is happening, and this is wrong.