The following is the opinion and analysis of the writer:
Rusty Childress
At a western governors’ meeting, Katie Hobbs of Arizona pointed at the Upper Basin states and accused them of running out the clock, refusing to take real cuts, while Arizona has already worn the austerity belt. Meanwhile, Spencer Cox of Utah said he understands Arizona’s position “if I were in the Lower Basin,” and then quietly added that Utah isn’t ready to simply surrender water quotas yet. The spectacle is predictable.
The long-expiring operating guidelines for the Colorado River system finally throw their papers out at the end of 2026. The federal “deadline” of Nov. 11, 2025, passed without a new deal. Now the federal government is warming its “intervention” engines.
Still, the storyline out of Arizona politics is comfort. “We’re leading on conservation,” says Hobbs. “We won’t accept a deal that dumps all cuts on Arizona.” The sub-text: “We’ve done our share; you do yours.” It’s the state’s greatest hits playlist: leafy greens, national chip manufacturing, tribal claims. Powerful. Passionate. Politically spun. But it won’t change the hydrology.
Because the river doesn’t negotiate. It delivers what nature allows — less every year — and the deeper irony is that these negotiations assume the old river still exists. It doesn’t.
Arizona is already living under Tier 1 shortages: around 18 % of its Colorado River allocation cut this year. Next year? Another slice. And post-2026? You begin to talk in millions of acre-feet. No number of “talks” between governors will refill the deficit.
What’s missing from the script is meaningful action. Approving new subdivisions while asking citizens to conserve. Continuing promotion of “assured water supply” marketing while the river shrinks. This is not water diplomacy — it’s theater for donors and camera angles.
While governors posture, the true crisis sprawls. Urban growth, developers and infrastructure expansion assume infinite water. Yet the river’s flow is shrinking, reservoirs are dropping, and the legislation that kept the system stable expires in 14 months.
So yes, blame the Upper Basin. But Arizona must also ask: what are we doing while we wait to be “treated fairly”? Because fairness won’t fill a canal. It won’t refill an aquifer. It won’t replace 40 million acre-feet of missing water.
If you’re a city council member, stop approving large new developments that rely on speculative water schemes. If you’re a developer: stop thinking “augmentation” is a guarantee years from now. If you’re a voter: ask the candidate if growth will be limited when supply shrinks — and hold them to it.
And to the governors? Words matter — but only physics moves water. So, while you declare sanctions and equity and fairness, remember the river doesn’t care who is right. It only cares who has less. And soon, everyone will.
Follow these steps to easily submit a letter to the editor or guest opinion to the Arizona Daily Star.
