Arizona entered Saturday evening on track for a No. 1 NCAA Tournament seed, but the Wildcats might not have much margin for error if they want to keep it.

During its Saturday morning β€œEarly Bracket Preview” show on CBS, the NCAA Tournament selection committee assigned the Wildcats the West Region’s No. 1 seed and the fourth overall seed behind the three other No. 1s: No. 1 overall seed Purdue (Midwest), UConn (East) and Houston (South).

That indicates Arizona could be vulnerable to dropping below the top seed line, especially considering the collective weakness among the Wildcats’ remaining Pac-12 opponents.

CBS analyst Seth Davis even predicted on the bracket preview show that the Wildcats would slip below the No. 1 seed line because they have no Quad 1 opportunities left on their schedule. Arizona is 7-3 in Quad one games, but all its remaining regular season games are Quad 2 games except their home game against ASU late Saturday, which was a Quad 3.

Arizona’s coach Tommy Lloyd directs the McKale Center crowd to stand up and make some noise during the Wildcats’ Dec. 9 blowout win over Wisconsin. That 25-point victory over the then-No. 23 Badgers is looking better by the week. While Arizona was penciled in as a No. 1 seed in the NCAA’s β€œearly bracket preview” Saturday morning (the Wildcats are projected as the West Region’s top seed), Wisconsin came in as No. 4 in the East (16th overall).

β€œMarquette’s got four (Quad 1 games); Tennessee has four,” Davis said. β€œTo me, they’re like racehorses, kind of getting on that inside rail, seeing the dash to the finish line. I think one of those two is gonna jump.”

KJ Lewis and Arizona hung tough to beat then-No. 2 Duke in Durham, North Carolina, back in November. Will the Wildcats have the chance to do it again in the NCAA Tournament? Arizona was penciled in as a No. 1 seed in the West Region β€” Duke is at No. 3 in the West β€” when the NCAA released its "early bracket preview" Saturday morning.

When asked about Davis’ comment during an interview with the Star after he appeared on the CBS show Saturday, committee chair Charles McClelland said only that all teams would be evaluated on their entire rΓ©sumΓ©s at the time of seeding.

β€œWe won’t project out,” said McClelland, the Southwestern Athletic Conference commissioner. β€œI think what’s probably most prominent when you start talking about the Quads is `win the games that you have on your schedule.’

β€œRight now, Arizona already has seven Quad 1 wins. So they’ve done a really good job of winning the games in Quad 1. We don’t necessarily go compare if you have X number here and X number there. What we look at is who you play, where you play and what the result is.”

UA could pick up Quad 1 opportunities in the Pac-12 Tournament if the Wildcats face Washington State (36), Colorado (42) or Utah (48). Games against Oregon (63) and Washington (67) could count as Quad 1 games in the tournament if those teams rise to No. 50 or better before then.

Quad 1 games are defined as those at home against teams with a 1-30 NET ranking, neutral games against the top-50 teams and road games against the top 75. Quad 2 games are home games against teams ranked 31-75, neutral games against teams 51-100, and away games against teams 76-135.

Arizona forward Keshad Johnson (16) gets squeezed by Alabama guard Mark Sears (1), right, and forward Grant Nelson (2) in the second half of the Wildcats' Dec. 20 victory over the Crimson Tide in Phoenix. Arizona, projected as one of the four No. 1 seeds when the NCAA released its "early bracket preview," is 3-1 against the 15 other teams mentioned in Saturday's release. That includes wins over Duke (West No. 3), Wisconsin (East No. 4) and Alabama (South No. 3).

The good news for the Wildcats is that, according to McClelland, they had separated themselves from teams below the No. 1 seed line as of early Saturday. Arizona (19-5 overall and 10-3 in the Pac-12) sat in first place in the Pac-12 heading into its home game with ASU and was the No. 3 ranked team in the NCAA’s NET ratings.

McClelland said all 12 committee members had the top four teams in the exact same order: Purdue first, followed by UConn, then Houston and finally Arizona.

β€œFrom my understanding, that had never been done prior,” McClelland said. β€œIt tells you the job that these four teams have done. It’s significant, simply because they’ve put in a lot of work. And when you look at their resumes, they’ve earned the right to be on these top seed lines.”

It’s a different story below the fourth seed line, where a number of teams have the potential to jump into the preferred 1-4 seed range.

β€œWhen you start getting into the five, six, and possibly seven seeds, there are additional blemishes on their resumes that might not necessarily be on fourth, third, second or first,” McClelland said. β€œBut this is February the 17th. There’s still four weeks of basketball to be played, which is an eternity in collegiate basketball. There definitely will be some moves.”

Purdue center Zach Edey (15) shoots over Arizona's Oumar Ballo (11) and Pelle Larsson in the second half of the Boilermakers' 92-84 win over the then-No. 1 Wildcats on Dec. 16 in Indianapolis. Like Arizona, Purdue was projected Saturday by the NCAA in its "early bracket preview" as a No. 1 seed in the upcoming 2024 NCAA Men's Basketball Tournament.

Before starting in 2017 to announce the top 16 teams about a month before the NCAA Tournament, the committee’s projections were kept entirely behind closed doors, leaving only media bracket projections to guess at the field until Selection Sunday. McClelland said holding them has helped generate more interest in the tournament overall and in the Final Four.

β€œAnd I think ultimately, it could serve as some additional motivation for some of those teams that see themselves on the outside looking in,” to the top 16 teams, McClelland said.

β€œSo we view it as 100% positive and an exciting opportunity to show the fans what we are thinking inside of the committee room and giving those teams an opportunity to continue to enhance their resume.”

Arizona has added some unique aspects to the committee’s work this season: Not only will the Final Four be held in Glendale for the second time, after it also was in 2016-17, but former Arizona athletic director Dave Heeke had to step down from the committee after he left UA last month.

Roughly one month out from Selection Sunday, the NCAA's "early bracket preview" was unveiled Saturday, with Arizona projected as a No. 1 seed out of the West Region. Four other teams Arizona has played this season were in the Top 16 revealed Saturday: Purdue, Duke, Wisconsin and Alabama. The Wildcats are 3-1 against those four opponents in 2023-24.

But McClelland noted that the committee does not discuss locations during team evaluations and that Heeke’s replacement, Oregon State AD Scott Barnes, had already been chairman (in 2015) during a previous stint on the committee.

Barnes β€œtook the torch and ran with it like he was on the committee from Day 1,” McClelland said.

Even if Arizona drops below the No. 1 seed line, the Wildcats appear likely to stay in the West Region and won’t have to travel to any state other than those bordering Arizona the rest of this season.

The Wildcats will likely play first-weekend games in a four-team pod at Salt Lake City and if they win their first two games, advance to the West Region semifinal and final games in Los Angeles for a chance at the Final Four in Glendale.

McClelland said the No. 1 overall seed gets to choose which first-weekend location to play at, while the other top seeds are assigned to the closest spot; Salt Lake City is the only first-weekend site within 1,000 miles of Tucson.

NCAA Tournament selections will be announced on March 17, a day after the Pac-12 Tournament championship game is held in Las Vegas. If assigned to Salt Lake City, Arizona would begin NCAA Tournament play on Thursday, March 21.


Become a #ThisIsTucson member! Your contribution helps our team bring you stories that keep you connected to the community. Become a member today.

Contact sports reporter Bruce Pascoe at bpascoe@tucson.com. On X(Twitter): @brucepascoe