The chairman of the Independent Redistricting Commission, which will redraw Arizona's congressional maps after the 2020 Census, is supposed to be a nonpartisan independent.Β 

 Arizona Daily Star / file

PHOENIX β€” A lawsuit filed by top Democratic legislative leaders challenging nominations for the Independent Redistricting Commission should be thrown out, an attorney for the nominating panel said Wednesday.

Assistant Attorney General Michael Catlett said there’s no legal basis for the complaint by House Minority Leader Charlene Fernandez and David Bradley, her Senate counterpart, that two people on the list are not legally qualified to be considered for the lone β€œindependent” slot on the five-member redistricting panel.

Catlett does not dispute that one of them, Coconino County resident Robert Wilson, hosted a campaign event for President Trump in the parking lot of his Flagstaff gun store.

He also said Wilson has occasionally hosted β€œmeet and greets” for Republican candidates at his business. And Catlett said Wilson did vote in the Republican primary, as political independents are entitled to do.

But Catlett said Wilson has been a registered independent since 2005. He said that more than meets the terms of the 2000 voter-approved constitutional amendment creating the commission, which draws the lines for legislative and congressional districts. It requires the independent nominee to have been independent for just three years.

Everything else is irrelevant, Catlett told Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Janice Crawford.

If those who drafted the constitutional amendment β€œwanted to include additional requirements to prove one’s unaffiliated status, they could have easily done so,” Catlett wrote. β€œThe courts should not second-guess that decision 20 years later.”

Catlett acknowledged that Thomas Loquvam, the other independent nominee whose status is being challenged, is registered as a lobbyist with the Arizona Corporation Commission because of his employment with utility Epcor.

Members of the redistricting commission cannot have served as a β€œregistered paid lobbyist” in the past three years.

Tohono Chul Park, 7366 Paseo del Norte, is open every day. Get tickets online only at TohonoChul.org. October 2020.

But Catlett contends the prohibition against lobbyists serving on the redistricting panel applies only to those who lobby the Arizona Legislature. He argues it could never have been the intent to apply the ban to those who lobby the Corporation Commission.

β€œThe ACC’s registration scheme was not in existence when voters added the IRC process to the constitution,” he wrote, pointing out that the Corporation Commission didn’t create its lobbyist registration system until 2018.

The judge has scheduled a hearing for Thursday, Oct. 29, to hear arguments.

The 2000 voter-approved system requires legislative leaders every 10 years β€” after each census β€” to choose four members of the redistricting commission.

But they must select from those nominated by the separate Commission on Appellate Court Appointments, the group Catlett represents. That panel forwarded the names of 10 Republicans, 10 Democrats and five political independents.

The majority and minority leaders of both houses each pick one. Then those four name a fifth from the list of political independents.

The redistricting panel has the power to determine the political direction of the state for the coming decade. Its members can draw lines that give one party or the other an edge during elections based on political registration.

Crawford needs to make at least one decision immediately: whether to bring the selection process to a halt while she considers the qualifications of Wilson and Loquvam.

The Arizona Constitution gives the first pick to the speaker of the House. But once that selection is made, each successive choice β€” by the House minority leader, the Senate president and the Senate minority leader β€” has to be made within seven days or that person forfeits her or his pick.

House Speaker Russell Bowers started the clock running Oct. 22 with his selection of Republican David Mehl, a Tucson developer. Unless Crawford stops the clock, Fernandez needs to make her choice Oct. 29 or get no role in the process.

Catlett is telling Crawford that delaying the process while she decides whether Wilson or Loquvam are legally nominated β€œwould require the court to unilaterally and unfairly alter the constitutional selection deadlines.”

Become a #ThisIsTucson member! Your contribution helps our team bring you stories that keep you connected to the community. Become a member today.