Sheriff Napier addresses Pima County supervisors

The Board of Supervisors voted in September to reject last yearโ€™s $1.4 million Stonegarden grant despite appeals from Sheriff Mark Napier.

The future of a relatively new citizen-run commission that reviews grants for the Pima County Sheriffโ€™s Department is in danger amid allegations that the committee is โ€œanti-law enforcement.โ€

The two Republican members of the Board of Supervisors โ€” Ally Miller and Steve Christy โ€” announced last week that they would cut ties to the Community Law Enforcement Partnership Commission and asked their delegates โ€” three from each office โ€” to stop attending the meetings.

โ€œWe will be withdrawing from any participation on this commission effective immediately,โ€ Christy and Miller wrote in a press release.

โ€œIt is time to end the unfounded attacks on the law enforcement community.โ€

Members of the commission and the Democrats on the Board of Supervisors reject this narrative, saying the 15-member group plays a role in reviewing and making recommendations on grants for the Pima County Sheriffโ€™s Department, not attacking law enforcement.

In the press release, Miller and Christy labeled the commission as being filled with โ€œanti-law enforcement community activistsโ€ whose placement on the commission was the equivalent of a โ€œtaxpayer-funded soapbox.โ€

The commission was formed last year as a condition for accepting Operation Stonegarden funding, which is tied to border security. But its current mission to make recommendations to the Board of Supervisors related to all law enforcement grants came later in the year, after the Democrat-led body reversed the decision to accept the $1.4 million in federal Stonegarden funding.

Members on the all-volunteer board are not paid for their time and the only taxpayer funds associated with the Community Law Enforcement Partnership Commission would be staff time for the Board of Supervisors-backed commission as well as the meeting space โ€” the same resources offered to all county commissions.

Christy attempted in December to dissolve the commission but failed to convince a majority of the supervisors.

He said the decision to ask his delegates not to attend the meetings is solely designed to break up the commission through parliamentarian rules. If the group is unable to get at least eight of the nine delegates appointed by the Democrats on the Board of Supervisors to attend, it cannot legally hold a meeting.

โ€œIf there is not a quorum, they canโ€™t conduct business,โ€ Christy explained.

Attendance at county commission meetings varies, but given that many meet during business hours on weekdays, it is common for some appointees to miss a meeting.

County Supervisor Sharon Bronson called the tactic unfortunate, saying that undermining the citizen-run commission goes against the nature of democracy.

She is confident the efforts wonโ€™t work and that her appointees will redouble efforts to attend every meeting.

Supervisor Ramรณn Valadez said he hopes Christy and Miller will change their minds, publicly pleading with the two Republicans on his Facebook Live chat last week.

He argues that the voices from Christy and Millerโ€™s appointees should be heard and that their opinions are vital to healthy discussion on the commission.

โ€œWithdrawing those commissioners doesnโ€™t serve anyone,โ€ he said.


Become a #ThisIsTucson member! Your contribution helps our team bring you stories that keep you connected to the community. Become a member today.

Contact reporter Joe Ferguson at jferguson@tucson.com or 573-4197. On Twitter: @JoeFerguson