The 20 US cities most threatened by sea level rise

Intro

Photo Credit: Sean Pavone / Alamy Stock Photo

With global temperatures rising at an alarming rate, climate change has become one of the most pressing issues of our time. A special report released by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) contends that land and ocean ecosystems are already starting to change as a result of high carbon emissions, and it is essential to keep the total global temperature increase below 1.5°C. If carbon emissions and pollution are left unchecked, human necessities like food security, natural resources, and urban development will be in jeopardy.

According to the IPCC report, one of the most drastic effects of climate change is rising sea levels. When sea levels rise, the likelihood of flooding and damage to infrastructure in coastal communities increases. However, not all coastal areas will be equally affected by sea level changes due to differences in topography, man-made barriers, and the distribution of residential and commercial structures.

A recent research report by Climate Central and Zillow analyzed these factors to determine which cities and states are most at risk for damage. According to the report, states on the East Coast are generally at a higher risk than those on the West Coast. In particular, 14.6 percent of all homes in Florida and 9.2 percent of homes in New Jersey are located in high-risk flood zones.

Despite the increased risk of flooding, damage, and loss with climate change, housing developers aren’t avoiding low-lying areas. According to the Climate Central and Zillow report, residential construction in high-risk flood zones is outpacing development in safer areas in more than half of U.S. coastal states.

A prime example is New Jersey, where Hurricane Sandy caused more than $70 billion in damage to coastal communities in 2012. Despite this, housing development in the state’s high-risk zones has, in recent years, far outpaced new home construction in safer areas. Other states with disproportionately high development rates in high-risk zones include Maine, New Hampshire, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Delaware, South Carolina, Mississippi, and Hawaii.

To get a more granular view of at-risk communities, Construction Coverage further analyzed the research report conducted by Climate Central and Zillow. Its researchers compiled a list of U.S. cities most threatened by sea-level rise based on the percentage of total housing units projected to be in high-risk zones by the year 2100 (assuming no reduction in carbon emissions).

The final list only includes cities with at least 25 percent of housing units in high risk zones. Notably, eight of the 20 most-at-risk cities are located in Florida and a large majority are located in the South. Here are the U.S. cities most threatened by rising sea levels.

20. Norfolk, VA

Photo Credit: D Guest Smith / Alamy Stock Photo

• Share of housing in risk zone: 26.6% (15,371 units)
• Share of housing value in risk zone: 35.4% ($4,643,842,605)
• Share of new housing in risk zone: 28.4% (614 units)
• Share of new housing value in risk zone: 32.4% ($221,360,723)
• Population: 245,752

19. Redwood City, CA

Photo Credit: Andrei Stanescu / Alamy Stock Photo

• Share of housing in risk zone: 30.5% (5,616 units)
• Share of housing value in risk zone: 28.1% ($9,000,683,143)
• Share of new housing in risk zone: 46.9% (68 units)
• Share of new housing value in risk zone: 33.0% ($104,394,023)
• Population: 84,368

18. Hampton, VA

Photo Credit: Will Daniel / Alamy Stock Photo

• Share of housing in risk zone: 31.4% (13,778 units)
• Share of housing value in risk zone: 35.7% ($2,808,529,119)
• Share of new housing in risk zone: 18.6% (151 units)
• Share of new housing value in risk zone: 21.4% ($49,265,020)
• Population: 136,255

17. Urban Honolulu, HI

Photo Credit: Gordon Fahey / Alamy Stock Photo

• Share of housing in risk zone: 32.2% (34,266 units)
• Share of housing value in risk zone: 13.9% ($23,401,665,985)
• Share of new housing in risk zone: 4.7% (40 units)
• Share of new housing value in risk zone: 5.2% ($72,922,633)
• Population: 350,788

16. Cambridge, MA

Photo Credit: Roman Babakin / Alamy Stock Photo

• Share of housing in risk zone: 33.4% (6,951 units)
• Share of housing value in risk zone: 33.7% ($9,085,789,460)
• Share of new housing in risk zone: 43.1% (31 units)
• Share of new housing value in risk zone: 82.7% ($414,580,573)
• Population: 110,893

15. Pompano Beach, FL

Photo Credit: philipus / Alamy Stock Photo

• Share of housing in risk zone: 34.0% (14,578 units)
• Share of housing value in risk zone: 45.1% ($5,573,881,697)
• Share of new housing in risk zone: 95.3% (41 units)
• Share of new housing value in risk zone: 86.1% ($33,181,407)
• Population: 107,542

14. Mount Pleasant, SC

Photo Credit: Will Daniel / Alamy Stock Photo

• Share of housing in risk zone: 34.2% (10,267 units)
• Share of housing value in risk zone: 40.1% ($6,823,448,812)
• Share of new housing in risk zone: 51.1% (957 units)
• Share of new housing value in risk zone: 55.2% ($764,179,050)
• Population: 80,661

13. Plantation, FL

Photo Credit: Ruth Peterkin / Alamy Stock Photo

• Share of housing in risk zone: 34.5% (10,192 units)
• Share of housing value in risk zone: 30.8% ($3,229,026,328)
• Share of new housing in risk zone: 82.1% (78 units)
• Share of new housing value in risk zone: 60.7% ($40,627,866)
• Population: 92,126

12. Miami, FL

Photo Credit: Sean Pavone / Alamy Stock Photo

• Share of housing in risk zone: 35.0% (37,859 units)
• Share of housing value in risk zone: 35.8% ($18,951,344,215)
• Share of new housing in risk zone: 15.0% (27 units)
• Share of new housing value in risk zone: 46.4% ($197,867,809)
• Population: 443,007

11. Alameda, CA

Photo Credit: trekandshoot / Alamy Stock Photo

• Share of housing in risk zone: 38.1% (7,057 units)
• Share of housing value in risk zone: 36.0% ($7,265,785,512)
• Share of new housing in risk zone: 51.6% (149 units)
• Share of new housing value in risk zone: 50.4% ($175,870,343)
• Population: 78,246

10. Charleston, SC

Photo Credit: Sean Pavone / Alamy Stock Photo

• Share of housing in risk zone: 38.6% (17,437 units)
• Share of housing value in risk zone: 49.4% ($10,617,186,228)
• Share of new housing in risk zone: 40.5% (1,547 units)
• Share of new housing value in risk zone: 55.7% ($1,096,697,545)
• Population: 131,204

9. San Mateo, CA

Photo Credit: Dionigi Pozzi / Alamy Stock Photo

• Share of housing in risk zone: 41.6% (10,890 units)
• Share of housing value in risk zone: 34.3% ($14,592,425,181)
• Share of new housing in risk zone: 67.7% (254 units)
• Share of new housing value in risk zone: 60.8% ($384,397,023)
• Population: 103,500

8. Hollywood, FL

Photo Credit: Kristina Blokhin / Alamy Stock Photo

• Share of housing in risk zone: 45.1% (23,018 units)
• Share of housing value in risk zone: 53.6% ($9,251,338,329)
• Share of new housing in risk zone: 38.3% (46 units)
• Share of new housing value in risk zone: 66.6% ($51,080,854)
• Population: 149,750

7. Fort Lauderdale, FL

Photo Credit: byvalet / Alamy Stock Photo

• Share of housing in risk zone: 61.2% (40,244 units)
• Share of housing value in risk zone: 65.6% ($23,148,655,526)
• Share of new housing in risk zone: 83.0% (151 units)
• Share of new housing value in risk zone: 82.1% ($552,058,317)
• Population: 177,175

6. Davie, FL

Photo Credit: Yaroslav Sabitov / Alamy Stock Photo

• Share of housing in risk zone: 64.0% (17,995 units)
• Share of housing value in risk zone: 54.2% ($6,057,281,606)
• Share of new housing in risk zone: 93.2% (123 units)
• Share of new housing value in risk zone: 89.0% ($89,661,044)
• Population: 101,543

5. Hialeah, FL

Photo Credit: Sean Pavone / Alamy Stock Photo

• Share of housing in risk zone: 64.5% (33,212 units)
• Share of housing value in risk zone: 60.2% ($7,908,923,725)
• Share of new housing in risk zone: 95.1% (626 units)
• Share of new housing value in risk zone: 95.2% ($223,134,520)
• Population: 237,523

4. Hilton Head Island, SC

Photo Credit: Sean Pavone / Alamy Stock Photo

• Share of housing in risk zone: 64.7% (17,553 units)
• Share of housing value in risk zone: 67.5% ($11,284,660,028)
• Share of new housing in risk zone: 57.3% (258 units)
• Share of new housing value in risk zone: 67.9% ($317,666,741)
• Population: 39,666

3. Ocean City, MD

Photo Credit: Cropper / Alamy Stock Photo

• Share of housing in risk zone: 72.7% (20,563 units)
• Share of housing value in risk zone: 71.2% ($6,078,889,499)
• Share of new housing in risk zone: 98.9% (173 units)
• Share of new housing value in risk zone: 97.8% ($78,967,638)
• Population: 7,026

2. Galveston, TX

Photo Credit: Duy Do / Alamy Stock Photo

• Share of housing in risk zone: 78.4% (17,581 units)
• Share of housing value in risk zone: 81.5% ($5,047,844,706)
• Share of new housing in risk zone: 93.9% (651 units)
• Share of new housing value in risk zone: 92.9% ($299,225,845)
• Population: 49,706

1. Miami Beach, FL

Photo Credit: IS2010-02 / Alamy Stock Photo

• Share of housing in risk zone: 85.2% (40,730 units)
• Share of housing value in risk zone: 84.1% ($37,604,140,241)
• Share of new housing in risk zone: 95.9% (140 units)
• Share of new housing value in risk zone: 95.2% ($1,228,309,663)
• Population: 92,187

Methodology and full results

The data used in this analysis is from a research report conducted by Climate Central and Zillow on the 150 largest coastal cities in the U.S. The research report includes various climate pollution scenarios, including “unchecked pollution,” “moderate carbon cuts,” and “deep carbon cuts.” Risk zones are classified as areas with elevations below local projected sea levels as well as areas with elevations below projected annual flood heights. Low-lying areas protected by topography or levees are excluded.

Real estate data from Zillow includes single-family homes, condominiums, and other multi-unit properties, such as duplexes. Buildings zoned for commercial residential use, such as apartment buildings, are not included. “New housing” refers to housing units built in 2010 or later. For a complete methodology, visit Climate Central.

Population data is from the U.S. Census Bureau 2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates. For the rankings in this article, cities were ordered based on the share of total housing units projected to be in risk zones by the year 2100 assuming “unchecked pollution.” Cities with at least 25 percent of housing units in high risk zones are included in the final list. For a complete list of results, see the original report on Construction Coverage.

July has officially become the hottest month ever recorded

BERLIN (AP) — Meteorologists say July was the hottest month measured on Earth since records began in 1880.

The U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said Thursday that July was 0.95 degrees Celsius (1.71 degrees Fahrenheit) warmer than the 20th century average for the month.

The results had been expected after several European countries reported new all-time temperature records in July. Scientists say the upward trend will likely continue because of man-made climate change.

Last month narrowly topped the previous July record, set in 2016, by 0.03 C (0.05 F)

June of this year had already set a sizzling record for that month over the past 140 years.

The year to date is also 0.95 C (1.71 F) above the long-term average, but still slightly behind 2016.

The 20 US cities most threatened by sea level rise