Although there is no statewide ban on texting while driving, Pima County has joined the cities of Tucson, Phoenix and Flagstaff and Coconino County in trying to curb the growing practice.
With a unanimous vote Tuesday morning, the Pima County Board of Supervisors approved an ordinance that prohibits drivers from using βa handheld electronic device for any purpose other than to initiate, receive, or engage in voice communication,β meaning making and receiving calls is still allowed while driving.
Before the vote, the supervisors heard from a number of residents, most of whom spoke in support of the measure.
Standing by a mangled bike to drive home his point, Brendan Lyons, who along with his girlfriend was struck by a distracted driver in 2013 , recounted his ordeal and the serious injuries he suffered.
βI hope this makes an impact on all of you,β he told the supervisors. βThis isnβt about politics. This is about public safety.β
The measure exempts law enforcement and emergency responders, those driving school buses and drivers in areas closed to the public. It also allows for all uses of cellphones while vehicles are stopped.
Violation of the ordinance is a civil traffic violation, punishable by a $100 when the driver is not involved in an accident and $250 if the driver is involved in an accident. The measure is to take effect 30 days after Tuesday.
Unlike Tucsonβs ban, the county ordinance makes violations a primary offense, meaning law enforcement officers can pull over any motorist they suspect is using a cell phone illegally.
In Tucson, officers must see motorists committing a primary offense before they can pull a driver over, according to Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos.
In the two years after Tucsonβs ban went into effect in 2012, just 50 citations were issued, leading some to question to impact of the measure.
Nanos said he hopes the county will βhave very few citations.β Though the ordinance will give his deputies more power to pull drivers over, he said they will use a βsense of reasonβ when enforcing the ordinance.
βThe goal isnβt to write a ticket,β he added. βThe goal is to get compliance.β
Nevertheless, several community members raised concerns about possible overreach.
Tucson resident Ken Rineer said the ordinance was βvagueβ and could be used to cite drivers for βjust holding a cellphone.β Similarly, Mark Spear said the ordinance could be used as a βpretextβ for stops.
Supervisors Ray Carroll and Sharon Bronson asked for a review of the ordinance after six months to evaluate its effectiveness.
Oro Valleyβs Town Council has put consideration of a similar measure on hold pending further research on the issue.
Of the roughly 29,400 collisions on Arizona state highways in 2015, distracted driving contributed to 2,729 of them, according to the Department of Public Safety.